2018International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied SciencesOpen access

Evaluation of Different Nutrient Management Practices for Enhancement of the Productivity in Different Rice Establishments Methods

Srivel Ravi, B. Ramakichenin Balagandhi

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

In crop nutrient management, crop yields can be increased by minimizing nutrient losses in the environment by managing nutrient supply to the root zone within a reasonable range which realizes the biological need of crops to match N requirement high-yielding crop, and controls nutrient losses. Minimal Nutrient supply and nutrient requirements in high yielding cropping systems must be matched in quantity and synchronized in time and space. To achieves this goal, to identify the optimum and cost effective nutrient management practices in different crop establishment methods, a study was conducted during 2015-16 and 2016-17, experiment was laid out in split plot design with 3 main plots {M1:Mechanical transplanting method (all the principles as per SRI), M2: Direct Seeding with SRI principles saturation method of water management weeding with cono weeder and fertilizer management and M3:Normal transplanting (20 x 15 cm with flood water management, 3-4 seedlings transplanted at 25 to30 days old seedlings and 5 subplots (S1- 100% RD, S2-75% inorganic + 25% organic equivalent N dose, S3-150% RDF, S4-LCC based N application and S5-Location specific fertilizer management. Among the crop establishments methods, use of mechanical transplanting and adopting all the principles as per SRI, performed excellently by registering higher yield attributes and grain yield of 5910 and 5767 kg ha-1 during Kharif 2015 and 2016, respectively. While comparing the method of nutrient management practices LCC based N application registered higher grain yield of 6430 and 6635 kg ha-1 during Kharif 2015 and 2016, respectively, which is also economically feasible besides higher net return due to reduce the cost of production particularly in edging out higher inorganic fertilizers without affecting the grain yield.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In crop nutrient management, crop yields can be increased by minimizing nutrient losses in the environment by managing nutrient supply to the root zone within a reasonable range which realizes the biological need of crops to match N requirement high-yielding crop, and controls nutrient losses. Minimal Nutrient supply and nutrient requirements in high yielding cropping systems must be matched in quantity and synchronized in time and space. To achieves this goal, to identify the optimum and cost effective nutrient management practices in different crop establishment methods, a study was conducted during 2015-16 and 2016-17, experiment was laid out in split plot design with 3 main plots {M1:Mechanical transplanting method (all the principles as per SRI), M2: Direct Seeding with SRI principles saturation method of water management weeding with cono weeder and fertilizer management and M3:Normal transplanting (20 x 15 cm with flood water management, 3-4 seedlings transplanted at 25 to30 days old seedlings and 5 subplots (S1- 100% RD, S2-75% inorganic + 25% organic equivalent N dose, S3-150% RDF, S4-LCC based N application and S5-Location specific fertilizer management. Among the crop establishments methods, use of mechanical transplanting and adopting all the principles as per SRI, performed excellently by registering higher yield attributes and grain yield of 5910 and 5767 kg ha-1 during Kharif 2015 and 2016, respectively. While comparing the method of nutrient management practices LCC based N application registered higher grain yield of 6430 and 6635 kg ha-1 during Kharif 2015 and 2016, respectively, which is also economically feasible besides higher net return due to reduce the cost of production particularly in edging out higher inorganic fertilizers without affecting the grain yield.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In crop nutrient management, crop yields can be increased by minimizing nutrient losses in the environment by managing nutrient supply to the root zone within a reasonable range which realizes the biological need of crops to match N requirement high-yielding crop, and controls nutrient losses. Minimal Nutrient supply and nutrient requirements in high yielding cropping systems must be matched in quantity and synchronized in time and space. To achieves this goal, to identify the optimum and cost effective nutrient management practices in different crop establishment methods, a study was conducted during 2015-16 and 2016-17, experiment was laid out in split plot design with 3 main plots {M1:Mechanical transplanting method (all the principles as per SRI), M2: Direct Seeding with SRI principles saturation method of water management weeding with cono weeder and fertilizer management and M3:Normal transplanting (20 x 15 cm with flood water management, 3-4 seedlings transplanted at 25 to30 days old seedlings and 5 subplots (S1- 100% RD, S2-75% inorganic + 25% organic equivalent N dose, S3-150% RDF, S4-LCC based N application and S5-Location specific fertilizer management. Among the crop establishments methods, use of mechanical transplanting and adopting all the principles as per SRI, performed excellently by registering higher yield attributes and grain yield of 5910 and 5767 kg ha-1 during Kharif 2015 and 2016, respectively. While comparing the method of nutrient management practices LCC based N application registered higher grain yield of 6430 and 6635 kg ha-1 during Kharif 2015 and 2016, respectively, which is also economically feasible besides higher net return due to reduce the cost of production particularly in edging out higher inorganic fertilizers without affecting the grain yield.

Key concepts: Kharif crop, Nutrient management, Transplanting, Nutrient, Fertilizer, Cropping system, Cropping, Crop

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Different Nutrient Management Practices for Enhancement of the Productivity in Different Rice Establishments Methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens