1987•Weed TechnologyRequires access

Herbicide Action on Purple and Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus rotundusandC. esculentus)

Welington Pereira, Garvin D. Crabtree, Ray D. William

Open publisher page 55 citations

Abstract

Historically, many herbicides have been tested for control of purple and yellow nutsedge, (Cyperus rotundusL. # CYPRO and (C. esculentusL. # CYPES). However, most chemicals provide only poor or temporary control. Reasons for failure include marginal translocation of herbicides to sites of action, temporary inhibition of tuber sprouting, and control of new tuber formation or inconsistent control when applied at different stages of growth and under various environmental conditions. Evaluation criteria that emphasize control of new plants and foliage rather than inhibition of tuber sprouting or new tuber production also contribute to erratic results. Progress toward solving these research problems is evident in studies of the influence of herbicides relative to nutsedge growth stages, new tuber development, and tuber recovery following treatment. In this review, nutsedge response to herbicides grouped by their mode of action within plants will be summarized.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Historically, many herbicides have been tested for control of purple and yellow nutsedge, (Cyperus rotundusL. # CYPRO and (C. esculentusL. # CYPES). However, most chemicals provide only poor or temporary control. Reasons for failure include marginal translocation of herbicides to sites of action, temporary inhibition of tuber sprouting, and control of new tuber formation or inconsistent control when applied at different stages of growth and under various environmental conditions. Evaluation criteria that emphasize control of new plants and foliage rather than inhibition of tuber sprouting or new tuber production also contribute to erratic results. Progress toward solving these research problems is evident in studies of the influence of herbicides relative to nutsedge growth stages, new tuber development, and tuber recovery following treatment. In this review, nutsedge response to herbicides grouped by their mode of action within plants will be summarized.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 55 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Historically, many herbicides have been tested for control of purple and yellow nutsedge, (Cyperus rotundusL. # CYPRO and (C. esculentusL. # CYPES). However, most chemicals provide only poor or temporary control. Reasons for failure include marginal translocation of herbicides to sites of action, temporary inhibition of tuber sprouting, and control of new tuber formation or inconsistent control when applied at different stages of growth and under various environmental conditions. Evaluation criteria that emphasize control of new plants and foliage rather than inhibition of tuber sprouting or new tuber production also contribute to erratic results. Progress toward solving these research problems is evident in studies of the influence of herbicides relative to nutsedge growth stages, new tuber development, and tuber recovery following treatment. In this review, nutsedge response to herbicides grouped by their mode of action within plants will be summarized.

Key concepts: Cyperus rotundus, Cyperus, Biology, Sprouting, Agronomy, Weed control, Glyphosate, Horticulture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Herbicide Action on Purple and Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus rotundusandC. esculentus) — Research Paper | ScholarLens