2018AQUA - Water Infrastructure Ecosystems and SocietyRequires access

Hydraulic evaluation of locally modified emitter under laboratory conditions

Harby Mostafa, W. M. Sultan

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Drip irrigation systems have become a major part of developing agriculture in Egypt and the aim of this research was to obtain the best performance from irrigation systems management using locally modified and original emitters. The experiments were carried out at the National Irrigation Laboratory of the Agricultural Engineering Research Institute. The emitters were tested and calibrated under different operating pressures (0.50, 0.75, 1 and 1.25 bar) to determine emitter flow rates and emitter emission uniformity (EU) and manufacturing variation coefficient (CV). The original emitter performance was determined using the relationship between emitter flow rate (2 lh−1) and operating pressure, with data indicating that the EU was 98.5%, at a CV of 2.3% and actual flow rate was 1.8 lh−1 for the original emitter. The EU was 93.8% with a CV of 5.2% and actual flow rate of 2.02 lh−1 for the modified emitter. For original emitter performance at 4 lh−1, data indicated that the EU was 96%, with a CV of 4.8% and actual flow rate of 3.78 lh−1. The EU for the modified emitter was 95% with a CV of 2.7% and actual flow rate of 4.5 lh−1. The emitter exponent values were 0.41 to 0.44 for modified and 0.37 to 0.38 for original emitters.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Drip irrigation systems have become a major part of developing agriculture in Egypt and the aim of this research was to obtain the best performance from irrigation systems management using locally modified and original emitters. The experiments were carried out at the National Irrigation Laboratory of the Agricultural Engineering Research Institute. The emitters were tested and calibrated under different operating pressures (0.50, 0.75, 1 and 1.25 bar) to determine emitter flow rates and emitter emission uniformity (EU) and manufacturing variation coefficient (CV). The original emitter performance was determined using the relationship between emitter flow rate (2 lh−1) and operating pressure, with data indicating that the EU was 98.5%, at a CV of 2.3% and actual flow rate was 1.8 lh−1 for the original emitter. The EU was 93.8% with a CV of 5.2% and actual flow rate of 2.02 lh−1 for the modified emitter. For original emitter performance at 4 lh−1, data indicated that the EU was 96%, with a CV of 4.8% and actual flow rate of 3.78 lh−1. The EU for the modified emitter was 95% with a CV of 2.7% and actual flow rate of 4.5 lh−1. The emitter exponent values were 0.41 to 0.44 for modified and 0.37 to 0.38 for original emitters.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Drip irrigation systems have become a major part of developing agriculture in Egypt and the aim of this research was to obtain the best performance from irrigation systems management using locally modified and original emitters. The experiments were carried out at the National Irrigation Laboratory of the Agricultural Engineering Research Institute. The emitters were tested and calibrated under different operating pressures (0.50, 0.75, 1 and 1.25 bar) to determine emitter flow rates and emitter emission uniformity (EU) and manufacturing variation coefficient (CV). The original emitter performance was determined using the relationship between emitter flow rate (2 lh−1) and operating pressure, with data indicating that the EU was 98.5%, at a CV of 2.3% and actual flow rate was 1.8 lh−1 for the original emitter. The EU was 93.8% with a CV of 5.2% and actual flow rate of 2.02 lh−1 for the modified emitter. For original emitter performance at 4 lh−1, data indicated that the EU was 96%, with a CV of 4.8% and actual flow rate of 3.78 lh−1. The EU for the modified emitter was 95% with a CV of 2.7% and actual flow rate of 4.5 lh−1. The emitter exponent values were 0.41 to 0.44 for modified and 0.37 to 0.38 for original emitters.

Key concepts: Common emitter, Volumetric flow rate, Drip irrigation, Irrigation, Flow (mathematics), Mathematics, Materials science, Analytical Chemistry (journal)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hydraulic evaluation of locally modified emitter under laboratory conditions — Research Paper | ScholarLens