ScholarLens Back to search
2013•e-Competitions BulletinRequires access

The US Supreme Court decides a case interpreting the doctrine of state action immunity from federal antitrust liability (Phoebe Putney Health System)

Max Huffman, Evan Bartel

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

I. The State Action Doctrine State Action immunity from the application of U.S. antitrust law was established by the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Parker v. Brown. Based on principles of…

About this research paper

What this paper is about

I. The State Action Doctrine State Action immunity from the application of U.S. antitrust law was established by the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Parker v. Brown. Based on principles of…

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

I. The State Action Doctrine State Action immunity from the application of U.S. antitrust law was established by the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Parker v. Brown. Based on principles of…

Key concepts: Supreme court, Doctrine, Law, Qualified immunity, State (computer science), Political science, Liability, Action (physics)

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The US Supreme Court decides a case interpreting the doctrine of state action immunity from federal antitrust liability (Phoebe Putney Health System) — Research Paper | ScholarLens