1972Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

Flight Test and Wind Tunnel Performance Characteristics of the X-24A lifting Body. Volume I

L. G. Ash

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The objectives of determining the performance characteristics of the X-24A lifting body from flight test data and correlating these results with wind tunnel predictions were successfully accomplished. Lift and drag characteristics were computed from onboard measured accelerations and flight conditions while the vehicle was in gliding flight. Performance data were obtained over Mach number and angle of attack ranges of 0.26 to 1.5 and 1.5 to 19.6 degrees, respectively. Discrepancies were apparent between different wind tunnel predictions. However, flight test data generally exhibited lower lift and slightly lower drag than wind tunnel predictions with the result that flight test and wind tunnel L/D values were in reasonably good agreement. Effects of Mach number, vehicle control surface configuration, and landing gear deployment on performance parameters were determined. Degradation of flight performance at low subsonic Mach numbers was attributed to tip fin flow separation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objectives of determining the performance characteristics of the X-24A lifting body from flight test data and correlating these results with wind tunnel predictions were successfully accomplished. Lift and drag characteristics were computed from onboard measured accelerations and flight conditions while the vehicle was in gliding flight. Performance data were obtained over Mach number and angle of attack ranges of 0.26 to 1.5 and 1.5 to 19.6 degrees, respectively. Discrepancies were apparent between different wind tunnel predictions. However, flight test data generally exhibited lower lift and slightly lower drag than wind tunnel predictions with the result that flight test and wind tunnel L/D values were in reasonably good agreement. Effects of Mach number, vehicle control surface configuration, and landing gear deployment on performance parameters were determined. Degradation of flight performance at low subsonic Mach numbers was attributed to tip fin flow separation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objectives of determining the performance characteristics of the X-24A lifting body from flight test data and correlating these results with wind tunnel predictions were successfully accomplished. Lift and drag characteristics were computed from onboard measured accelerations and flight conditions while the vehicle was in gliding flight. Performance data were obtained over Mach number and angle of attack ranges of 0.26 to 1.5 and 1.5 to 19.6 degrees, respectively. Discrepancies were apparent between different wind tunnel predictions. However, flight test data generally exhibited lower lift and slightly lower drag than wind tunnel predictions with the result that flight test and wind tunnel L/D values were in reasonably good agreement. Effects of Mach number, vehicle control surface configuration, and landing gear deployment on performance parameters were determined. Degradation of flight performance at low subsonic Mach numbers was attributed to tip fin flow separation.

Key concepts: Mach number, Wind tunnel, Angle of attack, Drag, Aerodynamics, Flight test, Lift-to-drag ratio, Aerospace engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Flight Test and Wind Tunnel Performance Characteristics of the X-24A lifting Body. Volume I — Research Paper | ScholarLens