2014•bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

Division of Labor: The Modernization of the Supreme Court of Georgia and Concomitant Workload Reduction Measures in the Court of Appeals

Kyle G.A. Wallace, Andrew J. Tuck, Max Marks

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This article addresses two distinct yet interrelated topics: the arcane and unnecessarily complex jurisdictional division between the Georgia Supreme Court and Georgia Court of Appeals, and the excessive caseload at the Georgia Court of Appeals.\nIn Part I.A., this article discusses Georgia’s appellate system—its history, the jurisdictional division that arose, the confusion the current jurisdictional framework creates, and the limitations and burdens it places on Georgia’s highest court. In Part I.B., the article discusses the current caseload at the Court of Appeals and the burden any jurisdictional reforms would have on the Court of Appeals. In Part II, the article presents a new clear jurisdictional framework for the Georgia Supreme Court and Georgia Court of Appeals, and at the same time, offers cost-effective solutions to ease the burden at the Court of Appeals, so that these jurisdictional changes can be implemented.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article addresses two distinct yet interrelated topics: the arcane and unnecessarily complex jurisdictional division between the Georgia Supreme Court and Georgia Court of Appeals, and the excessive caseload at the Georgia Court of Appeals.\nIn Part I.A., this article discusses Georgia’s appellate system—its history, the jurisdictional division that arose, the confusion the current jurisdictional framework creates, and the limitations and burdens it places on Georgia’s highest court. In Part I.B., the article discusses the current caseload at the Court of Appeals and the burden any jurisdictional reforms would have on the Court of Appeals. In Part II, the article presents a new clear jurisdictional framework for the Georgia Supreme Court and Georgia Court of Appeals, and at the same time, offers cost-effective solutions to ease the burden at the Court of Appeals, so that these jurisdictional changes can be implemented.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article addresses two distinct yet interrelated topics: the arcane and unnecessarily complex jurisdictional division between the Georgia Supreme Court and Georgia Court of Appeals, and the excessive caseload at the Georgia Court of Appeals.\nIn Part I.A., this article discusses Georgia’s appellate system—its history, the jurisdictional division that arose, the confusion the current jurisdictional framework creates, and the limitations and burdens it places on Georgia’s highest court. In Part I.B., the article discusses the current caseload at the Court of Appeals and the burden any jurisdictional reforms would have on the Court of Appeals. In Part II, the article presents a new clear jurisdictional framework for the Georgia Supreme Court and Georgia Court of Appeals, and at the same time, offers cost-effective solutions to ease the burden at the Court of Appeals, so that these jurisdictional changes can be implemented.

Key concepts: Supreme court, Modernization theory, Law, Workload, Political science, Division (mathematics), Power (physics), Reduction (mathematics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Division of Labor: The Modernization of the Supreme Court of Georgia and Concomitant Workload Reduction Measures in the Court of Appeals — Research Paper | ScholarLens