2017Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research ReportsOpen access

The Effects of an Evaporative Cooling System on Reducing Heat Load in Lactating Dairy Cows

J. R. Johnson, Milo Wolf, Jeffrey M. McBride, Michael J. Brouk

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of 2 cooling systems on barn temperature, core body temperature (CBT), respiration rate, rear udder temperature, and lying time in lactating Holstein dairy cows. Twenty lactating Holstein dairy cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups: CONV, where cows were housed in a conventional, open-sidewall freestall barn equipped with feedline soakers and fans located over the feedline and stalls; and TUNNEL, where cows were housed in a tunnel-ventilated freestall barn utilizing an evaporative cooling system. TUNNEL was effective at reducing barn temperature humidity index (THI) compared to CONV, but failed to alter CBT (101.5 ± 0.04°F). TUNNEL cows had reduced respiration rates (52.0 vs. 57.9 ± 2.2 breaths per minute) and skin temperatures (91.8 vs. 94.1 ± 0.6°F) compared to CONV, while TUNNEL cows had increased lying time by 1 hour per day (11.8 vs. 10.8 ± 0.3 hours per day). Overall, the evaporative cooling system (TUNNEL) was effective in reducing barn THI leading to reduced respiration rates and rear udder temperatures and increased daily lying time. No treatment differences were detected for CBT, however, likely a result of the cooler ambient conditions under which the study took place.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of 2 cooling systems on barn temperature, core body temperature (CBT), respiration rate, rear udder temperature, and lying time in lactating Holstein dairy cows. Twenty lactating Holstein dairy cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups: CONV, where cows were housed in a conventional, open-sidewall freestall barn equipped with feedline soakers and fans located over the feedline and stalls; and TUNNEL, where cows were housed in a tunnel-ventilated freestall barn utilizing an evaporative cooling system. TUNNEL was effective at reducing barn temperature humidity index (THI) compared to CONV, but failed to alter CBT (101.5 ± 0.04°F). TUNNEL cows had reduced respiration rates (52.0 vs. 57.9 ± 2.2 breaths per minute) and skin temperatures (91.8 vs. 94.1 ± 0.6°F) compared to CONV, while TUNNEL cows had increased lying time by 1 hour per day (11.8 vs. 10.8 ± 0.3 hours per day). Overall, the evaporative cooling system (TUNNEL) was effective in reducing barn THI leading to reduced respiration rates and rear udder temperatures and increased daily lying time. No treatment differences were detected for CBT, however, likely a result of the cooler ambient conditions under which the study took place.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of 2 cooling systems on barn temperature, core body temperature (CBT), respiration rate, rear udder temperature, and lying time in lactating Holstein dairy cows. Twenty lactating Holstein dairy cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups: CONV, where cows were housed in a conventional, open-sidewall freestall barn equipped with feedline soakers and fans located over the feedline and stalls; and TUNNEL, where cows were housed in a tunnel-ventilated freestall barn utilizing an evaporative cooling system. TUNNEL was effective at reducing barn temperature humidity index (THI) compared to CONV, but failed to alter CBT (101.5 ± 0.04°F). TUNNEL cows had reduced respiration rates (52.0 vs. 57.9 ± 2.2 breaths per minute) and skin temperatures (91.8 vs. 94.1 ± 0.6°F) compared to CONV, while TUNNEL cows had increased lying time by 1 hour per day (11.8 vs. 10.8 ± 0.3 hours per day). Overall, the evaporative cooling system (TUNNEL) was effective in reducing barn THI leading to reduced respiration rates and rear udder temperatures and increased daily lying time. No treatment differences were detected for CBT, however, likely a result of the cooler ambient conditions under which the study took place.

Key concepts: Barn, Animal science, Udder, Evaporative cooler, Thermoregulation, Heat index, Respiration rate, Milking

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Effects of an Evaporative Cooling System on Reducing Heat Load in Lactating Dairy Cows — Research Paper | ScholarLens