1995˜The œfortnightly reviewRequires access

The cost of capital does not compensate for stranded-cost risk

A. Lawrence Kolbe, William B. Tye

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Electric utilities now face the risk that existing assets, costs, or contract commitments may be {open_quotes}stranded{close_quotes} by increased competition, leaving shareholders rather than customers to bear the costs. Have shareholders already been compensated for this risk? Some argue that shareholders have automatically been compensated for this risk by an allowed rate of return equal to the cost of equity capital determined in efficient capital markets. If so, forcing shareholders to bear stranded costs may seem fair. However, this argument does not stand up to scrutiny, because the cost of capital by definition does not include such compensation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Electric utilities now face the risk that existing assets, costs, or contract commitments may be {open_quotes}stranded{close_quotes} by increased competition, leaving shareholders rather than customers to bear the costs. Have shareholders already been compensated for this risk? Some argue that shareholders have automatically been compensated for this risk by an allowed rate of return equal to the cost of equity capital determined in efficient capital markets. If so, forcing shareholders to bear stranded costs may seem fair. However, this argument does not stand up to scrutiny, because the cost of capital by definition does not include such compensation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Electric utilities now face the risk that existing assets, costs, or contract commitments may be {open_quotes}stranded{close_quotes} by increased competition, leaving shareholders rather than customers to bear the costs. Have shareholders already been compensated for this risk? Some argue that shareholders have automatically been compensated for this risk by an allowed rate of return equal to the cost of equity capital determined in efficient capital markets. If so, forcing shareholders to bear stranded costs may seem fair. However, this argument does not stand up to scrutiny, because the cost of capital by definition does not include such compensation.

Key concepts: Shareholder, Cost of capital, Scrutiny, Implicit cost, Economics, Cost of equity, Capital (architecture), Equity (law)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The cost of capital does not compensate for stranded-cost risk — Research Paper | ScholarLens