Coercion in mental healthcare: time for a change in direction
Andrew Molodynski, Yasser Khazaal, Felicity J. Callard
Abstract
Open-access reader
Andrew Molodynski, Yasser Khazaal, Felicity J. Callard
Abstract
Open-access reader
Coercion has always been integral to the care and treatment of people who are mentally ill and there is no 'perfect' model in which coercion is absent. A number of interventions have shown promise in reducing the use of coercion, however, and we believe the evidence points to ways forward that may improve both the experience and the outcome of care.
OpenAlex reports 51 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Coercion has always been integral to the care and treatment of people who are mentally ill and there is no 'perfect' model in which coercion is absent. A number of interventions have shown promise in reducing the use of coercion, however, and we believe the evidence points to ways forward that may improve both the experience and the outcome of care.
Key concepts: Coercion (linguistics), Mentally ill, Psychological intervention, Psychology, Outcome (game theory), Mental healthcare, Mental health, Psychotherapist