Evidence‐based adequacy criteria for instrumented urine cytology using cytospin preparations
Andrew A. Renshaw, Edwin W. Gould
Abstract
Andrew A. Renshaw, Edwin W. Gould
Abstract
Cytospin preparations of instrumented urine cytology specimens with less than 10 urothelial cells or more than 50 urothelial cells/10 hpfs are both associated with significantly increased false negative rates compared to cases with 10-49 urothelial cells/10 hpfs.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Cytospin preparations of instrumented urine cytology specimens with less than 10 urothelial cells or more than 50 urothelial cells/10 hpfs are both associated with significantly increased false negative rates compared to cases with 10-49 urothelial cells/10 hpfs.
Key concepts: Urine cytology, Medicine, Cytology, Urine, Urology, Pathology, Urothelial cancer, Internal medicine