2018Diagnostic CytopathologyRequires access

Evidence‐based adequacy criteria for instrumented urine cytology using cytospin preparations

Andrew A. Renshaw, Edwin W. Gould

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Cytospin preparations of instrumented urine cytology specimens with less than 10 urothelial cells or more than 50 urothelial cells/10 hpfs are both associated with significantly increased false negative rates compared to cases with 10-49 urothelial cells/10 hpfs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Cytospin preparations of instrumented urine cytology specimens with less than 10 urothelial cells or more than 50 urothelial cells/10 hpfs are both associated with significantly increased false negative rates compared to cases with 10-49 urothelial cells/10 hpfs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Cytospin preparations of instrumented urine cytology specimens with less than 10 urothelial cells or more than 50 urothelial cells/10 hpfs are both associated with significantly increased false negative rates compared to cases with 10-49 urothelial cells/10 hpfs.

Key concepts: Urine cytology, Medicine, Cytology, Urine, Urology, Pathology, Urothelial cancer, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evidence‐based adequacy criteria for instrumented urine cytology using cytospin preparations — Research Paper | ScholarLens