2017bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Open access

Molecular data from Orthonectid worms show they are highly degenerate members of phylum Annelida not phylum Mesozoa

Philipp H. Schiffer, Helen E. Robertson, Maximilian J. Telford

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Summary: The Mesozoa are a group of tiny, extremely simple, vermiform endoparasites of various marine animals (Fig. 1). There are two recognised groups within the Mesozoa: the Orthonectida (Fig. 1a,b; with a few hundred cells including a nervous system made up of just 10 cells [1]) and the Dicyemids (Fig. 1c; with at most 42 cells [2]). They are classic ‘Problematica’ [3] - the name Mesozoa suggests an evolutionary position intermediate between Protozoa and Metazoa (animals) [4] and implies their simplicity is a primitive state, but molecular data have shown they are members of Lophotrochozoa within Bilateria [5-8] which would mean they derive from a more complex ancestor. Their precise phylogenetic affinities remain uncertain, however, and ascertaining this is complicated by the very fast evolution observed in genes from both groups, leading to the common systematic error of Long Branch Attraction (LBA) [9]. Here we use mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequence data, and show beyond doubt that both dicyemids and orthonectids are members of the Lophotrochozoa. Carefully addressing the effects of systematic errors due to unequal rates of evolution, we show that the phylum Mesozoa is polyphyletic. While the precise position of dicyemids remains unresolved within Lophotrochozoa, we unequivocally identify orthonectids as members of the phylum Annelida. This result reveals one of the most extreme cases of body plan simplification in the animal kingdom; our finding makes sense of an annelid-like cuticle in orthonectids [1] and suggests the circular muscle cells repeated along their body [10] may be segmental in origin.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary: The Mesozoa are a group of tiny, extremely simple, vermiform endoparasites of various marine animals (Fig. 1). There are two recognised groups within the Mesozoa: the Orthonectida (Fig. 1a,b; with a few hundred cells including a nervous system made up of just 10 cells [1]) and the Dicyemids (Fig. 1c; with at most 42 cells [2]). They are classic ‘Problematica’ [3] - the name Mesozoa suggests an evolutionary position intermediate between Protozoa and Metazoa (animals) [4] and implies their simplicity is a primitive state, but molecular data have shown they are members of Lophotrochozoa within Bilateria [5-8] which would mean they derive from a more complex ancestor. Their precise phylogenetic affinities remain uncertain, however, and ascertaining this is complicated by the very fast evolution observed in genes from both groups, leading to the common systematic error of Long Branch Attraction (LBA) [9]. Here we use mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequence data, and show beyond doubt that both dicyemids and orthonectids are members of the Lophotrochozoa. Carefully addressing the effects of systematic errors due to unequal rates of evolution, we show that the phylum Mesozoa is polyphyletic. While the precise position of dicyemids remains unresolved within Lophotrochozoa, we unequivocally identify orthonectids as members of the phylum Annelida. This result reveals one of the most extreme cases of body plan simplification in the animal kingdom; our finding makes sense of an annelid-like cuticle in orthonectids [1] and suggests the circular muscle cells repeated along their body [10] may be segmental in origin.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary: The Mesozoa are a group of tiny, extremely simple, vermiform endoparasites of various marine animals (Fig. 1). There are two recognised groups within the Mesozoa: the Orthonectida (Fig. 1a,b; with a few hundred cells including a nervous system made up of just 10 cells [1]) and the Dicyemids (Fig. 1c; with at most 42 cells [2]). They are classic ‘Problematica’ [3] - the name Mesozoa suggests an evolutionary position intermediate between Protozoa and Metazoa (animals) [4] and implies their simplicity is a primitive state, but molecular data have shown they are members of Lophotrochozoa within Bilateria [5-8] which would mean they derive from a more complex ancestor. Their precise phylogenetic affinities remain uncertain, however, and ascertaining this is complicated by the very fast evolution observed in genes from both groups, leading to the common systematic error of Long Branch Attraction (LBA) [9]. Here we use mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequence data, and show beyond doubt that both dicyemids and orthonectids are members of the Lophotrochozoa. Carefully addressing the effects of systematic errors due to unequal rates of evolution, we show that the phylum Mesozoa is polyphyletic. While the precise position of dicyemids remains unresolved within Lophotrochozoa, we unequivocally identify orthonectids as members of the phylum Annelida. This result reveals one of the most extreme cases of body plan simplification in the animal kingdom; our finding makes sense of an annelid-like cuticle in orthonectids [1] and suggests the circular muscle cells repeated along their body [10] may be segmental in origin.

Key concepts: Bilateria, Phylum, Biology, Annelid, Polyphyly, Evolutionary biology, Body plan, Most recent common ancestor

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Molecular data from Orthonectid worms show they are highly degenerate members of phylum Annelida not phylum Mesozoa — Research Paper | ScholarLens