2008•International PsychiatryOpen access

First-episode psychosis: factors associated with delayed access to care in a rural Egyptian setting

Mamdouh El-Adl, Mohammed Elmahdy, Musheera Anis

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

Over the past few decades there has been a growing interest in first-episode psychosis (FEP), help-seeking behaviour and pathways to care. Treating psychotic disorders in their earliest stages has become a key focus for research and clinical care (Yung & McGorry, 2007). FEP studies show that the average time between onset of symptoms and first effective treatment is often 1 year or more (McGlashan, 1987). This long duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) is undesirable. Early treatment helps minimise the risk of the serious consequences of untreated psychosis, in terms of changes in mental state and behaviour (Larsen et al, 1998; Wyatt et al, 1998) and can reduce suffering (Ho et al, 2003). Some early results suggested that an ‘early intervention in psychosis’ (EIP) service is more cost-effective than generic services (Mihalopoulos et al, 1999).

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Over the past few decades there has been a growing interest in first-episode psychosis (FEP), help-seeking behaviour and pathways to care. Treating psychotic disorders in their earliest stages has become a key focus for research and clinical care (Yung & McGorry, 2007). FEP studies show that the average time between onset of symptoms and first effective treatment is often 1 year or more (McGlashan, 1987). This long duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) is undesirable. Early treatment helps minimise the risk of the serious consequences of untreated psychosis, in terms of changes in mental state and behaviour (Larsen et al, 1998; Wyatt et al, 1998) and can reduce suffering (Ho et al, 2003). Some early results suggested that an ‘early intervention in psychosis’ (EIP) service is more cost-effective than generic services (Mihalopoulos et al, 1999).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Over the past few decades there has been a growing interest in first-episode psychosis (FEP), help-seeking behaviour and pathways to care. Treating psychotic disorders in their earliest stages has become a key focus for research and clinical care (Yung & McGorry, 2007). FEP studies show that the average time between onset of symptoms and first effective treatment is often 1 year or more (McGlashan, 1987). This long duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) is undesirable. Early treatment helps minimise the risk of the serious consequences of untreated psychosis, in terms of changes in mental state and behaviour (Larsen et al, 1998; Wyatt et al, 1998) and can reduce suffering (Ho et al, 2003). Some early results suggested that an ‘early intervention in psychosis’ (EIP) service is more cost-effective than generic services (Mihalopoulos et al, 1999).

Key concepts: dup, Psychosis, Early psychosis, Psychiatry, Intervention (counseling), Psychology, Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming), Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
First-episode psychosis: factors associated with delayed access to care in a rural Egyptian setting — Research Paper | ScholarLens