2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Mediation v. sulh: A comparative study

Mohammad Hafiz Mohd Zaki, Mazbah Termizi, Muhammad Ridhwan Saleh, Nina Syazmeen Mohd Din, Siti Farhana Abu Hasan

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

One of the functions of law is for the settlement of dispute which led to the development of mediation and sulh in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process. Mediation is a process whereby both parties intend to reach consensus in resolving a dispute through an agreement between the parties whereby mediator become an assistance in terms of communication and negotiation. Meanwhile, sulh can be defined as a harmonise way to settle dispute between the parties which consists of negotiation, mediation, conciliation and compromise of action. There are some similarities and differences between mediation and sulh that can be seen from the perspective of its legality, types of dispute, as well as their process and outcome. The advantages of mediation and sulh are clear in the dispute resolution. Therefore, this paper seeks to study the similarities and differences between mediation and sulh by comparing them from various perspectives.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One of the functions of law is for the settlement of dispute which led to the development of mediation and sulh in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process. Mediation is a process whereby both parties intend to reach consensus in resolving a dispute through an agreement between the parties whereby mediator become an assistance in terms of communication and negotiation. Meanwhile, sulh can be defined as a harmonise way to settle dispute between the parties which consists of negotiation, mediation, conciliation and compromise of action. There are some similarities and differences between mediation and sulh that can be seen from the perspective of its legality, types of dispute, as well as their process and outcome. The advantages of mediation and sulh are clear in the dispute resolution. Therefore, this paper seeks to study the similarities and differences between mediation and sulh by comparing them from various perspectives.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One of the functions of law is for the settlement of dispute which led to the development of mediation and sulh in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process. Mediation is a process whereby both parties intend to reach consensus in resolving a dispute through an agreement between the parties whereby mediator become an assistance in terms of communication and negotiation. Meanwhile, sulh can be defined as a harmonise way to settle dispute between the parties which consists of negotiation, mediation, conciliation and compromise of action. There are some similarities and differences between mediation and sulh that can be seen from the perspective of its legality, types of dispute, as well as their process and outcome. The advantages of mediation and sulh are clear in the dispute resolution. Therefore, this paper seeks to study the similarities and differences between mediation and sulh by comparing them from various perspectives.

Key concepts: Conciliation, Mediation, Lawyer supported mediation, Alternative dispute resolution, Party-directed mediation, Dispute mechanism, Dispute resolution, Principle of legality

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mediation v. sulh: A comparative study — Research Paper | ScholarLens