ScholarLens Back to search
1999•Unpublished venueRequires access

Is the family court bound by the rules of evidence in children matters

Garry Watts

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

On 11 March 1999 the High Court handed down its long awaited decision in Northern Territory of Australia v GPAO (a case known at first instance and in the Full Court as Re Z).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

On 11 March 1999 the High Court handed down its long awaited decision in Northern Territory of Australia v GPAO (a case known at first instance and in the Full Court as Re Z).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

On 11 March 1999 the High Court handed down its long awaited decision in Northern Territory of Australia v GPAO (a case known at first instance and in the Full Court as Re Z).

Key concepts: High Court, Law, Political science, Court decision

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is the family court bound by the rules of evidence in children matters — Research Paper | ScholarLens