2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparison of antioxidant activity of different flours determined by DPPH and ABTS method

Mirela Kopjar, Nives Resiga, Tomaž Požrl, Vlasta Piližota

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare antioxidant activity of different flours (rye, barley, buckwheat, yellow corn and white corn) determined by DPPH and ABTS method. Antioxidant activity determined in extracts of flours by DPPH method ranged from 20.92 to 58.95 μmol TE/100 g and from 54.91 to 95.32 μmol TE/100 g by ABTS method. The lowest antioxidant activity was determined for yellow and white corn by both methods. The highest antioxidant activity was determined for barley, 58.95 μmol TE/100 g (DPPH method) and buckwheat, 95.32 μmol TE/100 g (ABTS method). Determination of antioxidant activity was also conducted by “QUENCHER” method which is based on using free radicals directly on sample without prior extraction. Values of antioxidant activity obtained from extracts, and directly from samples, were compared. Antioxidant activity was higher when “QUENCHER” method was used as evaluation method. ABTS antioxidant activity was higher in contrast to DPPH antioxidant activity (regardless of sample preparation) probably due to higher selectivity of DPPH free radicals. Also, EC50 (efficiency coefficient) and ARP (antiradical power) values were determined. Higher EC50 value was determined by DPPH method. Lower EC50 means that ARP is higher. The lowest EC50 had buckwheat flour (5.89 mg and 17.38 mg for ABTS and DPPH method, respectively) thus it had the highest ARP value.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objective of this study was to compare antioxidant activity of different flours (rye, barley, buckwheat, yellow corn and white corn) determined by DPPH and ABTS method. Antioxidant activity determined in extracts of flours by DPPH method ranged from 20.92 to 58.95 μmol TE/100 g and from 54.91 to 95.32 μmol TE/100 g by ABTS method. The lowest antioxidant activity was determined for yellow and white corn by both methods. The highest antioxidant activity was determined for barley, 58.95 μmol TE/100 g (DPPH method) and buckwheat, 95.32 μmol TE/100 g (ABTS method). Determination of antioxidant activity was also conducted by “QUENCHER” method which is based on using free radicals directly on sample without prior extraction. Values of antioxidant activity obtained from extracts, and directly from samples, were compared. Antioxidant activity was higher when “QUENCHER” method was used as evaluation method. ABTS antioxidant activity was higher in contrast to DPPH antioxidant activity (regardless of sample preparation) probably due to higher selectivity of DPPH free radicals. Also, EC50 (efficiency coefficient) and ARP (antiradical power) values were determined. Higher EC50 value was determined by DPPH method. Lower EC50 means that ARP is higher. The lowest EC50 had buckwheat flour (5.89 mg and 17.38 mg for ABTS and DPPH method, respectively) thus it had the highest ARP value.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objective of this study was to compare antioxidant activity of different flours (rye, barley, buckwheat, yellow corn and white corn) determined by DPPH and ABTS method. Antioxidant activity determined in extracts of flours by DPPH method ranged from 20.92 to 58.95 μmol TE/100 g and from 54.91 to 95.32 μmol TE/100 g by ABTS method. The lowest antioxidant activity was determined for yellow and white corn by both methods. The highest antioxidant activity was determined for barley, 58.95 μmol TE/100 g (DPPH method) and buckwheat, 95.32 μmol TE/100 g (ABTS method). Determination of antioxidant activity was also conducted by “QUENCHER” method which is based on using free radicals directly on sample without prior extraction. Values of antioxidant activity obtained from extracts, and directly from samples, were compared. Antioxidant activity was higher when “QUENCHER” method was used as evaluation method. ABTS antioxidant activity was higher in contrast to DPPH antioxidant activity (regardless of sample preparation) probably due to higher selectivity of DPPH free radicals. Also, EC50 (efficiency coefficient) and ARP (antiradical power) values were determined. Higher EC50 value was determined by DPPH method. Lower EC50 means that ARP is higher. The lowest EC50 had buckwheat flour (5.89 mg and 17.38 mg for ABTS and DPPH method, respectively) thus it had the highest ARP value.

Key concepts: DPPH, ABTS, Antioxidant, Chemistry, Food science, EC50, Organic chemistry, Biochemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of antioxidant activity of different flours determined by DPPH and ABTS method — Research Paper | ScholarLens