Einstein and Rastall theories of gravitation in comparison
F. Darabi, H. Moradpour, Ignazio Licata, Y. Heydarzade, Christian Corda
Abstract
Open-access reader
F. Darabi, H. Moradpour, Ignazio Licata, Y. Heydarzade, Christian Corda
Abstract
Open-access reader
We profit by a recent paper of Visser claiming that Rastall gravity is equivalent to Einstein gravity to compare the two gravitational theories in a general way. Our conclusions are different from Visser’s ones. We indeed argue that these two theories are not equivalent. In fact, Rastall theory of gravity is an “open” theory when compared to Einstein general theory of relativity. Thus, it is ready to accept the challenges of observational cosmology and quantum gravity.
OpenAlex reports 225 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We profit by a recent paper of Visser claiming that Rastall gravity is equivalent to Einstein gravity to compare the two gravitational theories in a general way. Our conclusions are different from Visser’s ones. We indeed argue that these two theories are not equivalent. In fact, Rastall theory of gravity is an “open” theory when compared to Einstein general theory of relativity. Thus, it is ready to accept the challenges of observational cosmology and quantum gravity.
Key concepts: Einstein, Gravitation, Mathematical physics, Parameterized post-Newtonian formalism, Physics, Theoretical physics, Classical mechanics, Classical field theory