2017Journal of Restorative MedicineOpen access

Iodine or Iodide? A Laboratory Evaluation of the Content of Powdered Iodine Supplements

Darrow Hand, Denis Wilson

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Some proponents of supplementation believe that products containing both iodine and iodide are therapeutically superior to iodide-only formulations. As a step toward evaluating this claim, we tested three commercially available products that list both iodine and iodide on the label, to determine their content.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Some proponents of supplementation believe that products containing both iodine and iodide are therapeutically superior to iodide-only formulations. As a step toward evaluating this claim, we tested three commercially available products that list both iodine and iodide on the label, to determine their content.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Some proponents of supplementation believe that products containing both iodine and iodide are therapeutically superior to iodide-only formulations. As a step toward evaluating this claim, we tested three commercially available products that list both iodine and iodide on the label, to determine their content.

Key concepts: Iodine, Iodide, Chemistry, Radiochemistry, Inorganic chemistry, Organic chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Iodine or Iodide? A Laboratory Evaluation of the Content of Powdered Iodine Supplements — Research Paper | ScholarLens