1997University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository (University of Missouri)Requires access

Is Strict Product Liability in Tort Identical to Implied Warranty in Contract in the Context of Personal Injuries

Sean M. Flower

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Product liability has evolved from a combination of contract and tort theories. Under current contract analysis a manufacturer is liable for injuries resulting from a product which is "unmerchantable," while under strict liability in tort a manufacturer is liable for injuries resulting from a product which is "defective.” The majority of legal scholars and jurisdictions have found that in the area of personal injury these two underlying tests are synonymous. This means, in effect, that all products found unmerchantable should also be found defective, and vice versa.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Product liability has evolved from a combination of contract and tort theories. Under current contract analysis a manufacturer is liable for injuries resulting from a product which is "unmerchantable," while under strict liability in tort a manufacturer is liable for injuries resulting from a product which is "defective.” The majority of legal scholars and jurisdictions have found that in the area of personal injury these two underlying tests are synonymous. This means, in effect, that all products found unmerchantable should also be found defective, and vice versa.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Product liability has evolved from a combination of contract and tort theories. Under current contract analysis a manufacturer is liable for injuries resulting from a product which is "unmerchantable," while under strict liability in tort a manufacturer is liable for injuries resulting from a product which is "defective.” The majority of legal scholars and jurisdictions have found that in the area of personal injury these two underlying tests are synonymous. This means, in effect, that all products found unmerchantable should also be found defective, and vice versa.

Key concepts: Warranty, Tort, Product liability, Personal injury, Context (archaeology), Business, Liability, Product (mathematics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is Strict Product Liability in Tort Identical to Implied Warranty in Contract in the Context of Personal Injuries — Research Paper | ScholarLens