CORRELATION BETWEEN SHAKING TABLE AND PSEUDO DYNAMIC RESPONSES : Earthquake response simulation capacity of pseudo dynamic testing
YUTAKA YAMAZAKI, Masayoshi Nakashima, Takashi Kaminosono, Yukio Izaki, Katsuma Maeda
Abstract
Open-access reader
YUTAKA YAMAZAKI, Masayoshi Nakashima, Takashi Kaminosono, Yukio Izaki, Katsuma Maeda
Abstract
Open-access reader
This paper reports an experimental investigation on the capacity of the pseudo dynamic testing technique to simulate the earthquake response behavior of structural systems. For this purpose, two types of steel structural systems : a two story unbraced frame system and a two story braced frame system, were tested. For each type, two identical specimens were fabricated; then, one was tested with a shaking table device, whereas the other tested using the pseudo dynamic testing technique. By direct comparison between the two response results, it was found 1) that the pseudo dynamic testing is a promising technique to directly simulate the earthquake response behavior of structural systems, 2) that the notable difference between the results was observed in the plastic flow of the displacement response, and 3) that the difference most probably had been caused because of the difference, although slight, in the hysteresis between the two responses.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper reports an experimental investigation on the capacity of the pseudo dynamic testing technique to simulate the earthquake response behavior of structural systems. For this purpose, two types of steel structural systems : a two story unbraced frame system and a two story braced frame system, were tested. For each type, two identical specimens were fabricated; then, one was tested with a shaking table device, whereas the other tested using the pseudo dynamic testing technique. By direct comparison between the two response results, it was found 1) that the pseudo dynamic testing is a promising technique to directly simulate the earthquake response behavior of structural systems, 2) that the notable difference between the results was observed in the plastic flow of the displacement response, and 3) that the difference most probably had been caused because of the difference, although slight, in the hysteresis between the two responses.
Key concepts: Earthquake shaking table, Dynamic testing, Structural engineering, Displacement (psychology), Frame (networking), Hysteresis, Earthquake simulation, Response analysis