2018International Zoo YearbookRequires access

Getting closer: contributions of zoo studies to research on the physiology and development of BonobosPan paniscus, ChimpanzeesPan troglodytesand other primates

Verena Behringer, Jeroen M. G. Stevens, Tobias Deschner, Gottfried Hohmann

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Behavioural studies on animals incorporate data on morphology, physiology and energetic status, as well as kinship and genetic information. Such measures have become the state of the art when assessing the function of a given behaviour. Zoos provide opportunities for research of a kind that is difficult to undertake in the wild. In this article several advantages of studying captive animals are highlighted; for example, accessibility, ease of sample collection, control of environmental factors, long‐term monitoring and known life histories, which can be tracked throughout the life of an individual. The data collected from such studies can be used to provide benchmarks for physiological and life‐history features. To demonstrate the type of studies to which zoos can contribute, examples are given from work with BonobosPan paniscusand ChimpanzeesPan troglodytes. Such studies improve our basic understanding of physiological processes in these apes, which could be applied to other non‐human primates. Data from zoo‐living animals promote validation and refinement of methods, add information that may be difficult to obtain from wild specimens and provide the means by which to scrutinize specific questions in experimental settings. Such data can serve as a benchmark for studies on wild conspecifics and inspire field studies by providing novel tools for data collection.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Behavioural studies on animals incorporate data on morphology, physiology and energetic status, as well as kinship and genetic information. Such measures have become the state of the art when assessing the function of a given behaviour. Zoos provide opportunities for research of a kind that is difficult to undertake in the wild. In this article several advantages of studying captive animals are highlighted; for example, accessibility, ease of sample collection, control of environmental factors, long‐term monitoring and known life histories, which can be tracked throughout the life of an individual. The data collected from such studies can be used to provide benchmarks for physiological and life‐history features. To demonstrate the type of studies to which zoos can contribute, examples are given from work with BonobosPan paniscusand ChimpanzeesPan troglodytes. Such studies improve our basic understanding of physiological processes in these apes, which could be applied to other non‐human primates. Data from zoo‐living animals promote validation and refinement of methods, add information that may be difficult to obtain from wild specimens and provide the means by which to scrutinize specific questions in experimental settings. Such data can serve as a benchmark for studies on wild conspecifics and inspire field studies by providing novel tools for data collection.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Behavioural studies on animals incorporate data on morphology, physiology and energetic status, as well as kinship and genetic information. Such measures have become the state of the art when assessing the function of a given behaviour. Zoos provide opportunities for research of a kind that is difficult to undertake in the wild. In this article several advantages of studying captive animals are highlighted; for example, accessibility, ease of sample collection, control of environmental factors, long‐term monitoring and known life histories, which can be tracked throughout the life of an individual. The data collected from such studies can be used to provide benchmarks for physiological and life‐history features. To demonstrate the type of studies to which zoos can contribute, examples are given from work with BonobosPan paniscusand ChimpanzeesPan troglodytes. Such studies improve our basic understanding of physiological processes in these apes, which could be applied to other non‐human primates. Data from zoo‐living animals promote validation and refinement of methods, add information that may be difficult to obtain from wild specimens and provide the means by which to scrutinize specific questions in experimental settings. Such data can serve as a benchmark for studies on wild conspecifics and inspire field studies by providing novel tools for data collection.

Key concepts: Troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Bonobo, Kinship, Biology, Ethology, Data collection, Zoology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Getting closer: contributions of zoo studies to research on the physiology and development of BonobosPan paniscus, ChimpanzeesPan troglodytesand other primates — Research Paper | ScholarLens