Breathing exercises for asthma - results of the BREATHE study
Mike Thomas, Anne Bruton, Lucy Yardley, James Raftery, Jenny Versnel, Amanda Lee, Ian Pavord, Paul Little, Mike Moore, Ratko Djukanović, Stephen T. Holgate, David Price
Abstract
Mike Thomas, Anne Bruton, Lucy Yardley, James Raftery, Jenny Versnel, Amanda Lee, Ian Pavord, Paul Little, Mike Moore, Ratko Djukanović, Stephen T. Holgate, David Price
Abstract
Background: Despite effective pharmacotherapy, asthma impairs the quality of life (QoL) of most patients. Non-pharmacologic approaches, including breathing retraining, are of great interest to patients but under-used due difficulties in accessing therapy Methods: A self-guided digital breathing retraining intervention delivered as a DVD plus printed booklet (DVDB) was developed and its effectiveness evaluated in a pragmatic 12-month, 3-armed RCT involving 655 adult asthmatics, compared to 3 ‘face-to-face’ respiratory physiotherapist sessions plus booklet (powered for equivalence), and with ‘usual care’ as control (powered for superiority). The primary outcome was Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score, secondary outcomes included patient-reported and physiological measures of asthma, and healthcare costs. Results: AQLQ scores were significantly higher than control in the DVDB group; adjusted mean difference, 95% CI: 0.28 (0.11, 0.44), p<0.001, number needed to treat (NNT) 8, and in the FTF group: 0.24 (0.04, 0.44), p<0.05, NNT 7, with equivalence between DVDB and FTF: 0.04, (-0.16, 0.24). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. Process evaluations showed good patient engagement and acceptability. Healthcare costs were lower in both intervention groups than usual care, outweighing the cost of providing the intervention, and lowest in the DVDB group. Conclusions: Breathing retraining programmes improve QoL in patients with incompletely controlled asthma. They reduce healthcare costs, despite having no significant effect on lung function or airways inflammation. They can be delivered conveniently and cheaply as a self-guided digital audiovisual physiotherapy programme as add-on treatment.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Background: Despite effective pharmacotherapy, asthma impairs the quality of life (QoL) of most patients. Non-pharmacologic approaches, including breathing retraining, are of great interest to patients but under-used due difficulties in accessing therapy Methods: A self-guided digital breathing retraining intervention delivered as a DVD plus printed booklet (DVDB) was developed and its effectiveness evaluated in a pragmatic 12-month, 3-armed RCT involving 655 adult asthmatics, compared to 3 ‘face-to-face’ respiratory physiotherapist sessions plus booklet (powered for equivalence), and with ‘usual care’ as control (powered for superiority). The primary outcome was Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score, secondary outcomes included patient-reported and physiological measures of asthma, and healthcare costs. Results: AQLQ scores were significantly higher than control in the DVDB group; adjusted mean difference, 95% CI: 0.28 (0.11, 0.44), p<0.001, number needed to treat (NNT) 8, and in the FTF group: 0.24 (0.04, 0.44), p<0.05, NNT 7, with equivalence between DVDB and FTF: 0.04, (-0.16, 0.24). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. Process evaluations showed good patient engagement and acceptability. Healthcare costs were lower in both intervention groups than usual care, outweighing the cost of providing the intervention, and lowest in the DVDB group. Conclusions: Breathing retraining programmes improve QoL in patients with incompletely controlled asthma. They reduce healthcare costs, despite having no significant effect on lung function or airways inflammation. They can be delivered conveniently and cheaply as a self-guided digital audiovisual physiotherapy programme as add-on treatment.
Key concepts: Medicine, Asthma, Breathing, Anesthesia, Internal medicine