Adapting proof automation to adapt proofs
Talia Ringer, Nathaniel Yazdani, John Leo, Dan Grossman
Abstract
Talia Ringer, Nathaniel Yazdani, John Leo, Dan Grossman
Abstract
We extend proof automation in an interactive theorem prover to analyze changes in specifications and proofs. Our approach leverages the history of changes to specifications and proofs to search for a patch that can be applied to other specifications and proofs that need to change in analogous ways.
OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We extend proof automation in an interactive theorem prover to analyze changes in specifications and proofs. Our approach leverages the history of changes to specifications and proofs to search for a patch that can be applied to other specifications and proofs that need to change in analogous ways.
Key concepts: Mathematical proof, Gas meter prover, Computer science, Automated theorem proving, Proof assistant, Automation, Computer-assisted proof, Proof complexity