2018•Unpublished venueRequires access

Adapting proof automation to adapt proofs

Talia Ringer, Nathaniel Yazdani, John Leo, Dan Grossman

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

We extend proof automation in an interactive theorem prover to analyze changes in specifications and proofs. Our approach leverages the history of changes to specifications and proofs to search for a patch that can be applied to other specifications and proofs that need to change in analogous ways.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We extend proof automation in an interactive theorem prover to analyze changes in specifications and proofs. Our approach leverages the history of changes to specifications and proofs to search for a patch that can be applied to other specifications and proofs that need to change in analogous ways.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We extend proof automation in an interactive theorem prover to analyze changes in specifications and proofs. Our approach leverages the history of changes to specifications and proofs to search for a patch that can be applied to other specifications and proofs that need to change in analogous ways.

Key concepts: Mathematical proof, Gas meter prover, Computer science, Automated theorem proving, Proof assistant, Automation, Computer-assisted proof, Proof complexity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Adapting proof automation to adapt proofs — Research Paper | ScholarLens