2011•Unpublished venueRequires access

Evaluation of microleakage in fissure sealants using the conventional etching technique and self-etching adhesive, in teeth with artificial saliva

Silvia Montes de Oca Gómez, Carlos Morales Zavala, J. Adolfo Yamamoto Nagano

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Fissure sealants can prevent caries and demineralization process of dental enamel, however, sealants could increase the risk of caries when weak sealing provokes microleakage of substances and bacteria through the tooth and the sealant. A longitudinal and experimental study using 50 healthy teeth (bicuspid) and without restorations is presented, these teeth were divided in 4 groups: Every group was analyzed considering the following factors: Group 1: prophylaxis, acid etching and sealant, Group 2: prophylaxis, adhesive and sealant application, Group 3: prophylaxis, acid etching, salivary contamination and sealant application, Group 4: prophylaxis, salivary contamination, adhesive and sealant application. All groups were thermocycled at 500 cycles, tinged with methylene blue and seen with a microscope. The results showed that Group 4 was the one with a higher microleakage (61.5%). Group 3 had the higher percentage of detachment of the fissure sealant (41.5%). Group 1, which was treated with sealant using the conventional technique, showed the lower percentage of microleakage (32%). In relation to detached sealant it is concluded that the saliva used in Group 4 promoted the adhesion since it showed a lower percentage of removed sealant (20.5%). It was concluded that sealant application with the conventional technique obtained best results. The use of adhesive before the application of sealant showed microleakage. Teeth with saliva avoided the detachment of the sealant, it is assumed this fact might have happened because of the adhesive viscosity is diminished in contact with saliva, obtaining a better adhesion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Fissure sealants can prevent caries and demineralization process of dental enamel, however, sealants could increase the risk of caries when weak sealing provokes microleakage of substances and bacteria through the tooth and the sealant. A longitudinal and experimental study using 50 healthy teeth (bicuspid) and without restorations is presented, these teeth were divided in 4 groups: Every group was analyzed considering the following factors: Group 1: prophylaxis, acid etching and sealant, Group 2: prophylaxis, adhesive and sealant application, Group 3: prophylaxis, acid etching, salivary contamination and sealant application, Group 4: prophylaxis, salivary contamination, adhesive and sealant application. All groups were thermocycled at 500 cycles, tinged with methylene blue and seen with a microscope. The results showed that Group 4 was the one with a higher microleakage (61.5%). Group 3 had the higher percentage of detachment of the fissure sealant (41.5%). Group 1, which was treated with sealant using the conventional technique, showed the lower percentage of microleakage (32%). In relation to detached sealant it is concluded that the saliva used in Group 4 promoted the adhesion since it showed a lower percentage of removed sealant (20.5%). It was concluded that sealant application with the conventional technique obtained best results. The use of adhesive before the application of sealant showed microleakage. Teeth with saliva avoided the detachment of the sealant, it is assumed this fact might have happened because of the adhesive viscosity is diminished in contact with saliva, obtaining a better adhesion.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Fissure sealants can prevent caries and demineralization process of dental enamel, however, sealants could increase the risk of caries when weak sealing provokes microleakage of substances and bacteria through the tooth and the sealant. A longitudinal and experimental study using 50 healthy teeth (bicuspid) and without restorations is presented, these teeth were divided in 4 groups: Every group was analyzed considering the following factors: Group 1: prophylaxis, acid etching and sealant, Group 2: prophylaxis, adhesive and sealant application, Group 3: prophylaxis, acid etching, salivary contamination and sealant application, Group 4: prophylaxis, salivary contamination, adhesive and sealant application. All groups were thermocycled at 500 cycles, tinged with methylene blue and seen with a microscope. The results showed that Group 4 was the one with a higher microleakage (61.5%). Group 3 had the higher percentage of detachment of the fissure sealant (41.5%). Group 1, which was treated with sealant using the conventional technique, showed the lower percentage of microleakage (32%). In relation to detached sealant it is concluded that the saliva used in Group 4 promoted the adhesion since it showed a lower percentage of removed sealant (20.5%). It was concluded that sealant application with the conventional technique obtained best results. The use of adhesive before the application of sealant showed microleakage. Teeth with saliva avoided the detachment of the sealant, it is assumed this fact might have happened because of the adhesive viscosity is diminished in contact with saliva, obtaining a better adhesion.

Key concepts: Sealant, Dentistry, Saliva, Adhesive, Molar, Adhesion, Enamel paint, Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of microleakage in fissure sealants using the conventional etching technique and self-etching adhesive, in teeth with artificial saliva — Research Paper | ScholarLens