2017•Unpublished venueRequires access

Gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) during spirometry: prevalence and effects

Ming Yan Teo, Jerry Zhou, Vincent C. Ho, John Daniel Brannan

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Background: Variability during spirometry can persist despite control of technical and personal factors. We postulate spirometry induces GOR, which may cause variability of spirometry. Aims and Objectives: Pilot study assessing prevalence of GOR during spirometry and its effects on spirometry variability in subjects having outpatient GOR assessment. Methods: At the end of oesophageal manometry and 24hr pH monitoring, 56 subjects performed 2 sets of spirometry separated by a 10-minute break. We quantify 24hr GOR with the De-Meester score (≥14.72 in significant GOR). Assessment for GOR during spirometry starts with 1st spirometry and ends with 2nd spirometry. Variability of spirometry (%)=max value-min value/max value x 100. Results: 26 subjects (44%) had GOR during assessment: 18 during the 10-minute break with 3 persisting into the 2nd spirometry, 5 throughout assessment, and 3 during spirometry only. They tend to have higher De-Meester scores (mean 39.8 vs 26.8, t test p=0.13) and are more likely have a GOR event preceding the 1st spirometry (median time interval [min] 8.5 [IQR 5–12] vs 25 [IQR 10–70]), compared to 30 subjects without GOR during spirometry assessment. 15 subjects with GOR had reproducible spirometry: mean 2nd FVC and FEV1 were non-significantly higher by 20 & 12mL respectively. Mean variability of spirometry (%) ± SD was similar between GOR and non-GOR groups: Conclusion: GOR occurs during and following spirometry in subjects having outpatient GOR assessment, but does not significantly impact spirometry variability over 10 minutes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Variability during spirometry can persist despite control of technical and personal factors. We postulate spirometry induces GOR, which may cause variability of spirometry. Aims and Objectives: Pilot study assessing prevalence of GOR during spirometry and its effects on spirometry variability in subjects having outpatient GOR assessment. Methods: At the end of oesophageal manometry and 24hr pH monitoring, 56 subjects performed 2 sets of spirometry separated by a 10-minute break. We quantify 24hr GOR with the De-Meester score (≥14.72 in significant GOR). Assessment for GOR during spirometry starts with 1st spirometry and ends with 2nd spirometry. Variability of spirometry (%)=max value-min value/max value x 100. Results: 26 subjects (44%) had GOR during assessment: 18 during the 10-minute break with 3 persisting into the 2nd spirometry, 5 throughout assessment, and 3 during spirometry only. They tend to have higher De-Meester scores (mean 39.8 vs 26.8, t test p=0.13) and are more likely have a GOR event preceding the 1st spirometry (median time interval [min] 8.5 [IQR 5–12] vs 25 [IQR 10–70]), compared to 30 subjects without GOR during spirometry assessment. 15 subjects with GOR had reproducible spirometry: mean 2nd FVC and FEV1 were non-significantly higher by 20 & 12mL respectively. Mean variability of spirometry (%) ± SD was similar between GOR and non-GOR groups: Conclusion: GOR occurs during and following spirometry in subjects having outpatient GOR assessment, but does not significantly impact spirometry variability over 10 minutes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Variability during spirometry can persist despite control of technical and personal factors. We postulate spirometry induces GOR, which may cause variability of spirometry. Aims and Objectives: Pilot study assessing prevalence of GOR during spirometry and its effects on spirometry variability in subjects having outpatient GOR assessment. Methods: At the end of oesophageal manometry and 24hr pH monitoring, 56 subjects performed 2 sets of spirometry separated by a 10-minute break. We quantify 24hr GOR with the De-Meester score (≥14.72 in significant GOR). Assessment for GOR during spirometry starts with 1st spirometry and ends with 2nd spirometry. Variability of spirometry (%)=max value-min value/max value x 100. Results: 26 subjects (44%) had GOR during assessment: 18 during the 10-minute break with 3 persisting into the 2nd spirometry, 5 throughout assessment, and 3 during spirometry only. They tend to have higher De-Meester scores (mean 39.8 vs 26.8, t test p=0.13) and are more likely have a GOR event preceding the 1st spirometry (median time interval [min] 8.5 [IQR 5–12] vs 25 [IQR 10–70]), compared to 30 subjects without GOR during spirometry assessment. 15 subjects with GOR had reproducible spirometry: mean 2nd FVC and FEV1 were non-significantly higher by 20 & 12mL respectively. Mean variability of spirometry (%) ± SD was similar between GOR and non-GOR groups: Conclusion: GOR occurs during and following spirometry in subjects having outpatient GOR assessment, but does not significantly impact spirometry variability over 10 minutes.

Key concepts: Spirometry, Medicine, Internal medicine, Physical therapy, Asthma

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) during spirometry: prevalence and effects — Research Paper | ScholarLens