2014TransplantationRequires access

Liver Transplantation for MELD-Score 40 Patients: Preliminary Results and Single Center Experience.

Spiridon Vernadakis, Anand Paul, G. Gercken, G.C. Sotiropoulos

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To identify factors influencing the survival of liver transplanted patients with Model-for-End-Stage-Liver-Disease (MELD)-Score of 40. Summary Background Data:Organ shortage and the related waiting-list mortality have led to changes in the allocation criteria and introduction of the MELD-Score in the Eurotransplant Era. The highest medical urgency represents the current allocation principle for liver transplantation (LT). Patients with MELD-Score 40 have a 3-month survival probability of almost 0% without LT. Patients and Methods: Data of all adult patients transplanted in a 3.5-year period with a labMELD-score 40 were reviewed. Recipients with acute liver failure, high urgency listed patients for re-transplantation or patients receiving live donor LT were excluded. All operations were performed using standard surgical techniques. Donor and recipient perioperative characteristics, operative details, treatment-related complications and pathological findings were analyzed. Statistical analysis encompassed Kaplan-Meier analysis/log-rank test as well as univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Results: Thirty patients were considered. The survival rate regarding the first 3, 6 and 9 months was 53% respectively and 50% after one year. 3-year patient survival was 50%. A re-transplantation has been performed in 4 cases. Graft survival was 57% at 3, 6, and 9 months, and 53% at one year, respectively. Forty-three variables were evaluated for prognostic significance. Multivariable analysis revealed preoperative dialysis (p=0.0246) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) (p=0.0231) to be independent prognostic factors for patient survival. A point scoring system was determined as follows: patients without PVT: patients with PVT=0:1 points; patients without pre-LT dialysis: patients with pre-LT dialysis=0:1 points. The model reached statistical significance (p=0.0007). 3-, and 12-months survival for scores 0, 1 and 2 were 72% and 72%, 51% and 42%, and 0%, respectively. Conclusions: According to our study coexistence of preoperative dialysis and PVT represents a clear contraindication for LT regarding MELD-score 40 patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To identify factors influencing the survival of liver transplanted patients with Model-for-End-Stage-Liver-Disease (MELD)-Score of 40. Summary Background Data:Organ shortage and the related waiting-list mortality have led to changes in the allocation criteria and introduction of the MELD-Score in the Eurotransplant Era. The highest medical urgency represents the current allocation principle for liver transplantation (LT). Patients with MELD-Score 40 have a 3-month survival probability of almost 0% without LT. Patients and Methods: Data of all adult patients transplanted in a 3.5-year period with a labMELD-score 40 were reviewed. Recipients with acute liver failure, high urgency listed patients for re-transplantation or patients receiving live donor LT were excluded. All operations were performed using standard surgical techniques. Donor and recipient perioperative characteristics, operative details, treatment-related complications and pathological findings were analyzed. Statistical analysis encompassed Kaplan-Meier analysis/log-rank test as well as univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Results: Thirty patients were considered. The survival rate regarding the first 3, 6 and 9 months was 53% respectively and 50% after one year. 3-year patient survival was 50%. A re-transplantation has been performed in 4 cases. Graft survival was 57% at 3, 6, and 9 months, and 53% at one year, respectively. Forty-three variables were evaluated for prognostic significance. Multivariable analysis revealed preoperative dialysis (p=0.0246) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) (p=0.0231) to be independent prognostic factors for patient survival. A point scoring system was determined as follows: patients without PVT: patients with PVT=0:1 points; patients without pre-LT dialysis: patients with pre-LT dialysis=0:1 points. The model reached statistical significance (p=0.0007). 3-, and 12-months survival for scores 0, 1 and 2 were 72% and 72%, 51% and 42%, and 0%, respectively. Conclusions: According to our study coexistence of preoperative dialysis and PVT represents a clear contraindication for LT regarding MELD-score 40 patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To identify factors influencing the survival of liver transplanted patients with Model-for-End-Stage-Liver-Disease (MELD)-Score of 40. Summary Background Data:Organ shortage and the related waiting-list mortality have led to changes in the allocation criteria and introduction of the MELD-Score in the Eurotransplant Era. The highest medical urgency represents the current allocation principle for liver transplantation (LT). Patients with MELD-Score 40 have a 3-month survival probability of almost 0% without LT. Patients and Methods: Data of all adult patients transplanted in a 3.5-year period with a labMELD-score 40 were reviewed. Recipients with acute liver failure, high urgency listed patients for re-transplantation or patients receiving live donor LT were excluded. All operations were performed using standard surgical techniques. Donor and recipient perioperative characteristics, operative details, treatment-related complications and pathological findings were analyzed. Statistical analysis encompassed Kaplan-Meier analysis/log-rank test as well as univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Results: Thirty patients were considered. The survival rate regarding the first 3, 6 and 9 months was 53% respectively and 50% after one year. 3-year patient survival was 50%. A re-transplantation has been performed in 4 cases. Graft survival was 57% at 3, 6, and 9 months, and 53% at one year, respectively. Forty-three variables were evaluated for prognostic significance. Multivariable analysis revealed preoperative dialysis (p=0.0246) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) (p=0.0231) to be independent prognostic factors for patient survival. A point scoring system was determined as follows: patients without PVT: patients with PVT=0:1 points; patients without pre-LT dialysis: patients with pre-LT dialysis=0:1 points. The model reached statistical significance (p=0.0007). 3-, and 12-months survival for scores 0, 1 and 2 were 72% and 72%, 51% and 42%, and 0%, respectively. Conclusions: According to our study coexistence of preoperative dialysis and PVT represents a clear contraindication for LT regarding MELD-score 40 patients.

Key concepts: Single Center, Medicine, Liver transplantation, Transplantation, Internal medicine, Surgery, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Liver Transplantation for MELD-Score 40 Patients: Preliminary Results and Single Center Experience. — Research Paper | ScholarLens