1984Unpublished venueRequires access

Reservoir induced seismicity studies related to the Wivenhoe Dam in southeastern Queensland - pre-pounding stage

J. M. W. Rynn, John P. Webb

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The procedure is to observe the seismicity in the vicinity of a reservoir and so deduce the abundance of induced earthquakes for comparison with the background (or normal) seismicity of the region. This involves monitoring during the pre- and post-impounding stages, taking particular note of the rate of change of water level during filling and subsequent normal operations of the reservoir. Many such surveillance projects have been instigated and in the majority of cases, the results clearly indicate the existence of induced seismicity (Simpson, 1976). Subsequent studies then attempt to define causal relationships between the seismicity and parameters relevant to the reservoir, with particular emphasis on the effect of the regional ambient stress conditions (Gupta and Rastogi, 1976).The field procedures for reservoir induced seismicity studies are essentially those employed in standard microearthquake surveys and follow the recommendations given by Adams, Gough and Muirhead (1973).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The procedure is to observe the seismicity in the vicinity of a reservoir and so deduce the abundance of induced earthquakes for comparison with the background (or normal) seismicity of the region. This involves monitoring during the pre- and post-impounding stages, taking particular note of the rate of change of water level during filling and subsequent normal operations of the reservoir. Many such surveillance projects have been instigated and in the majority of cases, the results clearly indicate the existence of induced seismicity (Simpson, 1976). Subsequent studies then attempt to define causal relationships between the seismicity and parameters relevant to the reservoir, with particular emphasis on the effect of the regional ambient stress conditions (Gupta and Rastogi, 1976).The field procedures for reservoir induced seismicity studies are essentially those employed in standard microearthquake surveys and follow the recommendations given by Adams, Gough and Muirhead (1973).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The procedure is to observe the seismicity in the vicinity of a reservoir and so deduce the abundance of induced earthquakes for comparison with the background (or normal) seismicity of the region. This involves monitoring during the pre- and post-impounding stages, taking particular note of the rate of change of water level during filling and subsequent normal operations of the reservoir. Many such surveillance projects have been instigated and in the majority of cases, the results clearly indicate the existence of induced seismicity (Simpson, 1976). Subsequent studies then attempt to define causal relationships between the seismicity and parameters relevant to the reservoir, with particular emphasis on the effect of the regional ambient stress conditions (Gupta and Rastogi, 1976).The field procedures for reservoir induced seismicity studies are essentially those employed in standard microearthquake surveys and follow the recommendations given by Adams, Gough and Muirhead (1973).

Key concepts: Induced seismicity, Microearthquake, Geology, Seismology, Stage (stratigraphy), Paleontology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reservoir induced seismicity studies related to the Wivenhoe Dam in southeastern Queensland - pre-pounding stage — Research Paper | ScholarLens