2018•Key engineering materialsOpen access

Seismic Stability of Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames

Santiago R. Zaruma, Larry A. Fahnestock

Open full text 12 citations

Abstract

Buckling Restrained Braced Frames (BRBFs) are widely used as seismic force resisting systems due to their ductility and energy dissipation. However, because of the modest overstrength and relatively low post-yielding stiffness, BRBFs subjected to seismic loading may be susceptible to concentrations of story drift and global instability triggered by P-∆ effects. Due to the use of simplistic methods that are based on elastic stability, current code design provisions do not address seismic stability rigorously and do not consider the particular inelastic response of a system. Design strategies are needed to prevent undesirable seismic response in BRBFs, such as drift concentration and large residual drift. This study used the FEMA P-695 Methodology to evaluate the response of current U.S. code-based BRBF designs and to study the effect on seismic stability of three potential enhancements: strong-axis orientation for BRBF columns, gravity column contribution, and a BRBF-SMRF dual system. Results from nonlinear static and dynamic analyses allowed assessment of seismic behavior. Results from collapse performance evaluation quantify the improvement that is achieved with each alternative and provide a means of comparison.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Buckling Restrained Braced Frames (BRBFs) are widely used as seismic force resisting systems due to their ductility and energy dissipation. However, because of the modest overstrength and relatively low post-yielding stiffness, BRBFs subjected to seismic loading may be susceptible to concentrations of story drift and global instability triggered by P-∆ effects. Due to the use of simplistic methods that are based on elastic stability, current code design provisions do not address seismic stability rigorously and do not consider the particular inelastic response of a system. Design strategies are needed to prevent undesirable seismic response in BRBFs, such as drift concentration and large residual drift. This study used the FEMA P-695 Methodology to evaluate the response of current U.S. code-based BRBF designs and to study the effect on seismic stability of three potential enhancements: strong-axis orientation for BRBF columns, gravity column contribution, and a BRBF-SMRF dual system. Results from nonlinear static and dynamic analyses allowed assessment of seismic behavior. Results from collapse performance evaluation quantify the improvement that is achieved with each alternative and provide a means of comparison.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Buckling Restrained Braced Frames (BRBFs) are widely used as seismic force resisting systems due to their ductility and energy dissipation. However, because of the modest overstrength and relatively low post-yielding stiffness, BRBFs subjected to seismic loading may be susceptible to concentrations of story drift and global instability triggered by P-∆ effects. Due to the use of simplistic methods that are based on elastic stability, current code design provisions do not address seismic stability rigorously and do not consider the particular inelastic response of a system. Design strategies are needed to prevent undesirable seismic response in BRBFs, such as drift concentration and large residual drift. This study used the FEMA P-695 Methodology to evaluate the response of current U.S. code-based BRBF designs and to study the effect on seismic stability of three potential enhancements: strong-axis orientation for BRBF columns, gravity column contribution, and a BRBF-SMRF dual system. Results from nonlinear static and dynamic analyses allowed assessment of seismic behavior. Results from collapse performance evaluation quantify the improvement that is achieved with each alternative and provide a means of comparison.

Key concepts: Structural engineering, Buckling, Dissipation, Seismic analysis, Stiffness, Residual, Stability (learning theory), Braced frame

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Seismic Stability of Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames — Research Paper | ScholarLens