2017The Journal of UrologyRequires access

Radical Nephrectomy with or without Lymph Node Dissection for High Risk Nonmetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Analysis

Boris Gershman, R. Houston Thompson, Stephen A. Boorjian, Alessandro Larcher, Umberto Capitanio, Francesco Montorsi, Cristina Carenzi, Roberto Bertini, Alberto Briganti, Christine M. Lohse, John C. Cheville, Bradley C. Leibovich

Open publisher page 62 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Lymph node dissection may benefit patients at increased risk for lymph node metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Therefore, we evaluated the association of lymph node dissection with survival in patients at high risk undergoing radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 2,722 patients with M0 renal cell carcinoma who underwent radical nephrectomy with or without lymph node dissection at 2 international centers from 1990 to 2010. The associations of lymph node dissection with the development of distant metastases, and cancer specific and all cause mortality were evaluated using propensity score techniques and traditional multivariable Cox regression. Subset analyses were done to examine patients at increased risk of lymph node metastases. RESULTS: Overall 171 patients (6.3%) had pN1 disease. Median followup was 9.6 years. Clinicopathological features were well balanced after propensity score adjustment. Lymph node dissection was not significantly associated with a reduced risk of distant metastases, or cancer specific or all cause mortality in the overall cohort, among patients with preoperative radiographic lymphadenopathy (cN1), or across an increasing probability of pN1 disease from 0.10 or greater to 0.50 or greater. Neither extended lymph node dissection nor the extent of lymph node dissection was associated with improved oncologic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis of a large, international cohort indicates that lymph node dissection is not associated with improved oncologic outcomes among patients at high risk who undergo radical nephrectomy for M0 renal cell carcinoma. This includes patients with radiographic lymphadenopathy (cN1) and across increasing probability thresholds of pN1 disease.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: Lymph node dissection may benefit patients at increased risk for lymph node metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Therefore, we evaluated the association of lymph node dissection with survival in patients at high risk undergoing radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 2,722 patients with M0 renal cell carcinoma who underwent radical nephrectomy with or without lymph node dissection at 2 international centers from 1990 to 2010. The associations of lymph node dissection with the development of distant metastases, and cancer specific and all cause mortality were evaluated using propensity score techniques and traditional multivariable Cox regression. Subset analyses were done to examine patients at increased risk of lymph node metastases. RESULTS: Overall 171 patients (6.3%) had pN1 disease. Median followup was 9.6 years. Clinicopathological features were well balanced after propensity score adjustment. Lymph node dissection was not significantly associated with a reduced risk of distant metastases, or cancer specific or all cause mortality in the overall cohort, among patients with preoperative radiographic lymphadenopathy (cN1), or across an increasing probability of pN1 disease from 0.10 or greater to 0.50 or greater. Neither extended lymph node dissection nor the extent of lymph node dissection was associated with improved oncologic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis of a large, international cohort indicates that lymph node dissection is not associated with improved oncologic outcomes among patients at high risk who undergo radical nephrectomy for M0 renal cell carcinoma. This includes patients with radiographic lymphadenopathy (cN1) and across increasing probability thresholds of pN1 disease.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 62 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: Lymph node dissection may benefit patients at increased risk for lymph node metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Therefore, we evaluated the association of lymph node dissection with survival in patients at high risk undergoing radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 2,722 patients with M0 renal cell carcinoma who underwent radical nephrectomy with or without lymph node dissection at 2 international centers from 1990 to 2010. The associations of lymph node dissection with the development of distant metastases, and cancer specific and all cause mortality were evaluated using propensity score techniques and traditional multivariable Cox regression. Subset analyses were done to examine patients at increased risk of lymph node metastases. RESULTS: Overall 171 patients (6.3%) had pN1 disease. Median followup was 9.6 years. Clinicopathological features were well balanced after propensity score adjustment. Lymph node dissection was not significantly associated with a reduced risk of distant metastases, or cancer specific or all cause mortality in the overall cohort, among patients with preoperative radiographic lymphadenopathy (cN1), or across an increasing probability of pN1 disease from 0.10 or greater to 0.50 or greater. Neither extended lymph node dissection nor the extent of lymph node dissection was associated with improved oncologic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis of a large, international cohort indicates that lymph node dissection is not associated with improved oncologic outcomes among patients at high risk who undergo radical nephrectomy for M0 renal cell carcinoma. This includes patients with radiographic lymphadenopathy (cN1) and across increasing probability thresholds of pN1 disease.

Key concepts: Medicine, Nephrectomy, Dissection (medical), Renal cell carcinoma, Lymph node, Urology, General surgery, Oncology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Radical Nephrectomy with or without Lymph Node Dissection for High Risk Nonmetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens