2005•University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas)Requires access

Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Trinko: Telecommunications Consumers Cannot Use Antitrust Laws to Remedy Access Violations of Telecommunications Act

Janice E. Rubin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko (540 U.S. 398 2004), the Supreme Court denied the antitrust claim advanced by a consumer of telecommunications services against a local exchange carrier that had previously been subject to regulatory discipline by both the Federal Communications Commission and the New York Public Service Commission. According to the Court, the fact that Verizon had been found to have breached its duty under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to adequately share its network with telecommunications companies — including AT&T, which provided service to Trinko — wishing to provide competitive local exchange services did not provide sufficient basis for finding a violation of the antitrust laws.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko (540 U.S. 398 2004), the Supreme Court denied the antitrust claim advanced by a consumer of telecommunications services against a local exchange carrier that had previously been subject to regulatory discipline by both the Federal Communications Commission and the New York Public Service Commission. According to the Court, the fact that Verizon had been found to have breached its duty under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to adequately share its network with telecommunications companies — including AT&T, which provided service to Trinko — wishing to provide competitive local exchange services did not provide sufficient basis for finding a violation of the antitrust laws.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko (540 U.S. 398 2004), the Supreme Court denied the antitrust claim advanced by a consumer of telecommunications services against a local exchange carrier that had previously been subject to regulatory discipline by both the Federal Communications Commission and the New York Public Service Commission. According to the Court, the fact that Verizon had been found to have breached its duty under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to adequately share its network with telecommunications companies — including AT&T, which provided service to Trinko — wishing to provide competitive local exchange services did not provide sufficient basis for finding a violation of the antitrust laws.

Key concepts: Commission, Telecommunications service, Telecommunications, Law, Communications law, Supreme court, Business, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Trinko: Telecommunications Consumers Cannot Use Antitrust Laws to Remedy Access Violations of Telecommunications Act — Research Paper | ScholarLens