2016International Journal of Aquatic Research and EducationOpen access

Parental Perceptions of Water Competence and Drowning Risk for Themselves and Their Children in an Open Water Environment

Teresa Stanley, Kevin Moran

Open full text 16 citations

Abstract

Little is known about people’s perceptions of how much swimming competency is required to provide protection from drowning, especially in open water environments where most drowning incidents occurs. This study reports on parental perceptions (n = 309) of swimming competency of themselves and their children, and parents beliefs on their safety when swimming in open water. Most parents (58%) considered themselves good/very good swimmers, although more than half (55%) considered that they could swim 25 m or less. Most parents (87%) reported that their children could swim, with more than one half (52%) believing that their child’s swimming competency was good/very good, yet most (74%) considered their child could swim only 25 m or less. Most parents (59%) and almost all children (81%) had never actually swum their reported distance in open water. In spite of these low levels of competency, one half (51%) of parents thought their children were safe/very safe in open water. The implications of an overly optimistic belief in the protective value of minimal levels of swimming competency for open water safety are discussed. Further exploration of the difference between real and perceived swimming competency, especially with at-risk groups such as males, are recommended.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Little is known about people’s perceptions of how much swimming competency is required to provide protection from drowning, especially in open water environments where most drowning incidents occurs. This study reports on parental perceptions (n = 309) of swimming competency of themselves and their children, and parents beliefs on their safety when swimming in open water. Most parents (58%) considered themselves good/very good swimmers, although more than half (55%) considered that they could swim 25 m or less. Most parents (87%) reported that their children could swim, with more than one half (52%) believing that their child’s swimming competency was good/very good, yet most (74%) considered their child could swim only 25 m or less. Most parents (59%) and almost all children (81%) had never actually swum their reported distance in open water. In spite of these low levels of competency, one half (51%) of parents thought their children were safe/very safe in open water. The implications of an overly optimistic belief in the protective value of minimal levels of swimming competency for open water safety are discussed. Further exploration of the difference between real and perceived swimming competency, especially with at-risk groups such as males, are recommended.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Little is known about people’s perceptions of how much swimming competency is required to provide protection from drowning, especially in open water environments where most drowning incidents occurs. This study reports on parental perceptions (n = 309) of swimming competency of themselves and their children, and parents beliefs on their safety when swimming in open water. Most parents (58%) considered themselves good/very good swimmers, although more than half (55%) considered that they could swim 25 m or less. Most parents (87%) reported that their children could swim, with more than one half (52%) believing that their child’s swimming competency was good/very good, yet most (74%) considered their child could swim only 25 m or less. Most parents (59%) and almost all children (81%) had never actually swum their reported distance in open water. In spite of these low levels of competency, one half (51%) of parents thought their children were safe/very safe in open water. The implications of an overly optimistic belief in the protective value of minimal levels of swimming competency for open water safety are discussed. Further exploration of the difference between real and perceived swimming competency, especially with at-risk groups such as males, are recommended.

Key concepts: Open water, Water safety, Competence (human resources), Perception, Psychology, Developmental psychology, Occupational safety and health, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Parental Perceptions of Water Competence and Drowning Risk for Themselves and Their Children in an Open Water Environment — Research Paper | ScholarLens