2017Unpublished venueRequires access

THE PERSISTENCE OF CORPORATE PROFITABILITY

David A. Holland, Bryant A. Matthews

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

An intuitive approach for testing persistence in corporate profitability is to examine the transition rates of firms moving from one performance category to another over some time interval. Return on capital and its persistence vary by industry. Fade is a powerful and intuitive way to understand if a firm possesses a competitive advantage and for how long it is likely to persist. As persistence rises, the fade rate decreases, which extends a firm's period of competitive advantage. If firms do not move between quartiles, then persistence is high: Companies that make money will continue to make money. Conversely, if firms frequently change quartiles, then persistence is low: Companies that make money, as well as companies that don't, will become average performers with age. The high rate of persistence for Food, Beverage, and Tobacco (FBT) companies hints at strong barriers to entry that keep new competitors out and existing competitors locked in place.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An intuitive approach for testing persistence in corporate profitability is to examine the transition rates of firms moving from one performance category to another over some time interval. Return on capital and its persistence vary by industry. Fade is a powerful and intuitive way to understand if a firm possesses a competitive advantage and for how long it is likely to persist. As persistence rises, the fade rate decreases, which extends a firm's period of competitive advantage. If firms do not move between quartiles, then persistence is high: Companies that make money will continue to make money. Conversely, if firms frequently change quartiles, then persistence is low: Companies that make money, as well as companies that don't, will become average performers with age. The high rate of persistence for Food, Beverage, and Tobacco (FBT) companies hints at strong barriers to entry that keep new competitors out and existing competitors locked in place.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An intuitive approach for testing persistence in corporate profitability is to examine the transition rates of firms moving from one performance category to another over some time interval. Return on capital and its persistence vary by industry. Fade is a powerful and intuitive way to understand if a firm possesses a competitive advantage and for how long it is likely to persist. As persistence rises, the fade rate decreases, which extends a firm's period of competitive advantage. If firms do not move between quartiles, then persistence is high: Companies that make money will continue to make money. Conversely, if firms frequently change quartiles, then persistence is low: Companies that make money, as well as companies that don't, will become average performers with age. The high rate of persistence for Food, Beverage, and Tobacco (FBT) companies hints at strong barriers to entry that keep new competitors out and existing competitors locked in place.

Key concepts: Profitability index, Persistence (discontinuity), Competitor analysis, Business, Monetary economics, Competitive advantage, Industrial organization, Marketing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE PERSISTENCE OF CORPORATE PROFITABILITY — Research Paper | ScholarLens