2017•AIP conference proceedingsRequires access

Performance of generalized estimating equations using bias-corrected sandwich variance estimators with count outcomes

Taweesak Channgam

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The sandwich estimator is used for estimating the asymptotic variance of regression coefficient in generalized estimating equations (GEE), it has been widely-known that proposed by [1]. This estimator is biased downwards and underestimated for variances in small sample settings. Various alternative bias-corrected sandwich variance estimators have been proposed by [2], [3], [4], [5] and [6]. Evaluation of the GEE using of the bias-corrected sandwich variance estimators with count outcomes data is limited. In this paper, the performance of the six sandwich variance estimators is compared in the GEE under various scenarios with correlated count outcomes. Two working correlation structures (exchangeable: EX and autoregressive of order 1: AR-1), the true correlation parameters of AR-1 and EX (α = 0.3, 0.5, 0.7), sample sizes (n = 20, 40, 60), and cluster sizes (m = 2, 4, 6) are considered. Under small sample size, the six sandwich variance estimators have more variability and are not robust in the covariance of regression coefficients if the working correlation structure is misspecified. Results reveal that the GST estimator outperforms other sandwich estimators.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The sandwich estimator is used for estimating the asymptotic variance of regression coefficient in generalized estimating equations (GEE), it has been widely-known that proposed by [1]. This estimator is biased downwards and underestimated for variances in small sample settings. Various alternative bias-corrected sandwich variance estimators have been proposed by [2], [3], [4], [5] and [6]. Evaluation of the GEE using of the bias-corrected sandwich variance estimators with count outcomes data is limited. In this paper, the performance of the six sandwich variance estimators is compared in the GEE under various scenarios with correlated count outcomes. Two working correlation structures (exchangeable: EX and autoregressive of order 1: AR-1), the true correlation parameters of AR-1 and EX (α = 0.3, 0.5, 0.7), sample sizes (n = 20, 40, 60), and cluster sizes (m = 2, 4, 6) are considered. Under small sample size, the six sandwich variance estimators have more variability and are not robust in the covariance of regression coefficients if the working correlation structure is misspecified. Results reveal that the GST estimator outperforms other sandwich estimators.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The sandwich estimator is used for estimating the asymptotic variance of regression coefficient in generalized estimating equations (GEE), it has been widely-known that proposed by [1]. This estimator is biased downwards and underestimated for variances in small sample settings. Various alternative bias-corrected sandwich variance estimators have been proposed by [2], [3], [4], [5] and [6]. Evaluation of the GEE using of the bias-corrected sandwich variance estimators with count outcomes data is limited. In this paper, the performance of the six sandwich variance estimators is compared in the GEE under various scenarios with correlated count outcomes. Two working correlation structures (exchangeable: EX and autoregressive of order 1: AR-1), the true correlation parameters of AR-1 and EX (α = 0.3, 0.5, 0.7), sample sizes (n = 20, 40, 60), and cluster sizes (m = 2, 4, 6) are considered. Under small sample size, the six sandwich variance estimators have more variability and are not robust in the covariance of regression coefficients if the working correlation structure is misspecified. Results reveal that the GST estimator outperforms other sandwich estimators.

Key concepts: Estimator, Statistics, Mathematics, Autoregressive model, Generalized estimating equation, Variance (accounting), Estimating equations, Regression analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Performance of generalized estimating equations using bias-corrected sandwich variance estimators with count outcomes — Research Paper | ScholarLens