2017•Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania)Requires access

Instructional Leadership: How Principals Conceptualize Their Roles as School Leaders

Caryn D Cooper

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Several research studies in education have shown there is a strong correlation between K-12 school principals, instructional leadership, and student achievement (Liethwood, Seashore-Louis, Anderson, & Wahlstrom, 2004; Waters, Marzano, & McNulty, 2003). Research has further revealed that, second only to the classroom teacher, principals have a tremendous impact on student learning outcomes (Davis, Darling-Hammond, LaPointe, & Meyerson, 2005). While researchers vary in defining the level of impact, most agree that principals have an indirect impact on student achievement, and extant studies have recognized that principals are critical to student learning. Yet, prior studies provide little insight into how principals contextualize their roles. The primary objective of this study was to understand how early-career principals conceptualized their roles as leaders in schools, as well as the leadership practices used by four elementary/middle school principals. A secondary objective of the study was to understand how principals’ preparation, professional development, and other activities informed their conceptions and practices. The four principals in the study were asked about their preparation as well as any ongoing professional development they may have received. Qualitative methods of in-depth interviewing, on-site visits, and artifact collection were used to collect data from the four principals. The findings from this study revealed that principals’ roles were complex. The findings further revealed that principals did not feel that they were prepared to carry out their roles as instructional leadership. A major contribution of this study was related to understanding a principal’s trajectory to school leadership and how they were prepared. Given the limitations expressed by the principals, it is necessary for districts, state education departments and principal preparation programs to further investigate and develop programs to strengthen principals’ school leadership. Further research is also needed in understanding how principals utilize their time, including building the capacity of teacher leaders and other stakeholders in the school.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Several research studies in education have shown there is a strong correlation between K-12 school principals, instructional leadership, and student achievement (Liethwood, Seashore-Louis, Anderson, & Wahlstrom, 2004; Waters, Marzano, & McNulty, 2003). Research has further revealed that, second only to the classroom teacher, principals have a tremendous impact on student learning outcomes (Davis, Darling-Hammond, LaPointe, & Meyerson, 2005). While researchers vary in defining the level of impact, most agree that principals have an indirect impact on student achievement, and extant studies have recognized that principals are critical to student learning. Yet, prior studies provide little insight into how principals contextualize their roles. The primary objective of this study was to understand how early-career principals conceptualized their roles as leaders in schools, as well as the leadership practices used by four elementary/middle school principals. A secondary objective of the study was to understand how principals’ preparation, professional development, and other activities informed their conceptions and practices. The four principals in the study were asked about their preparation as well as any ongoing professional development they may have received. Qualitative methods of in-depth interviewing, on-site visits, and artifact collection were used to collect data from the four principals. The findings from this study revealed that principals’ roles were complex. The findings further revealed that principals did not feel that they were prepared to carry out their roles as instructional leadership. A major contribution of this study was related to understanding a principal’s trajectory to school leadership and how they were prepared. Given the limitations expressed by the principals, it is necessary for districts, state education departments and principal preparation programs to further investigate and develop programs to strengthen principals’ school leadership. Further research is also needed in understanding how principals utilize their time, including building the capacity of teacher leaders and other stakeholders in the school.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Several research studies in education have shown there is a strong correlation between K-12 school principals, instructional leadership, and student achievement (Liethwood, Seashore-Louis, Anderson, & Wahlstrom, 2004; Waters, Marzano, & McNulty, 2003). Research has further revealed that, second only to the classroom teacher, principals have a tremendous impact on student learning outcomes (Davis, Darling-Hammond, LaPointe, & Meyerson, 2005). While researchers vary in defining the level of impact, most agree that principals have an indirect impact on student achievement, and extant studies have recognized that principals are critical to student learning. Yet, prior studies provide little insight into how principals contextualize their roles. The primary objective of this study was to understand how early-career principals conceptualized their roles as leaders in schools, as well as the leadership practices used by four elementary/middle school principals. A secondary objective of the study was to understand how principals’ preparation, professional development, and other activities informed their conceptions and practices. The four principals in the study were asked about their preparation as well as any ongoing professional development they may have received. Qualitative methods of in-depth interviewing, on-site visits, and artifact collection were used to collect data from the four principals. The findings from this study revealed that principals’ roles were complex. The findings further revealed that principals did not feel that they were prepared to carry out their roles as instructional leadership. A major contribution of this study was related to understanding a principal’s trajectory to school leadership and how they were prepared. Given the limitations expressed by the principals, it is necessary for districts, state education departments and principal preparation programs to further investigate and develop programs to strengthen principals’ school leadership. Further research is also needed in understanding how principals utilize their time, including building the capacity of teacher leaders and other stakeholders in the school.

Key concepts: Public relations, Instructional leadership, Pedagogy, Educational leadership, Psychology, Political science, Mathematics education, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Instructional Leadership: How Principals Conceptualize Their Roles as School Leaders — Research Paper | ScholarLens