2017•Journal of Clinical PathologyRequires access

Computer graphics for the microscopist

Jhonel Palomino, Anders Hånell

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Peering through the eyepiece of a microscope can reveal mesmerising sceneries, but science won’t progress unless they are shared with others. At the time of the first microscopes this could only be done by drawing images, thus requiring extensive artistic skills. Modern microscopes, on the other hand, use digital cameras, and capturing optimal micrographs instead requires a firm grasp of computer graphics. This is also needed to grasp the possibilities and potential pitfalls in digital pathology and diagnosis using image analysis algorithms. Computer graphics describes images as either raster graphics or vector graphics.1 Raster graphics images are divided into pixels, and this format is typically used for photographs stored as JPG or TIFF files. Vector graphics instead describe the image as geometrical objects and is typically used for graphs and text in EPS or PDF files. Micrographs are stored as raster graphics, but vector graphics can be used to add annotations with unlimited resolution (figure 1). Figure 1 (A) Raster graphics image of myelinated axons with annotations as vector graphics. (B) On magnification, the raster image is clearly pixelated while the vector graphics text remain in high resolution. (C) With the text ‘burned in’ to the image, the result is clearly inferior. (D) Anchor points (orange) and control lines (red) define the lines and Bezier curves that make up the vector graphics image of the number 5. Even though raster and vector graphics are conceptually very different, they handle colours in the same way.2 Since computers store information in bits, where each bit is either 0 or 1, and eight bits form …

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Peering through the eyepiece of a microscope can reveal mesmerising sceneries, but science won’t progress unless they are shared with others. At the time of the first microscopes this could only be done by drawing images, thus requiring extensive artistic skills. Modern microscopes, on the other hand, use digital cameras, and capturing optimal micrographs instead requires a firm grasp of computer graphics. This is also needed to grasp the possibilities and potential pitfalls in digital pathology and diagnosis using image analysis algorithms. Computer graphics describes images as either raster graphics or vector graphics.1 Raster graphics images are divided into pixels, and this format is typically used for photographs stored as JPG or TIFF files. Vector graphics instead describe the image as geometrical objects and is typically used for graphs and text in EPS or PDF files. Micrographs are stored as raster graphics, but vector graphics can be used to add annotations with unlimited resolution (figure 1). Figure 1 (A) Raster graphics image of myelinated axons with annotations as vector graphics. (B) On magnification, the raster image is clearly pixelated while the vector graphics text remain in high resolution. (C) With the text ‘burned in’ to the image, the result is clearly inferior. (D) Anchor points (orange) and control lines (red) define the lines and Bezier curves that make up the vector graphics image of the number 5. Even though raster and vector graphics are conceptually very different, they handle colours in the same way.2 Since computers store information in bits, where each bit is either 0 or 1, and eight bits form …

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Peering through the eyepiece of a microscope can reveal mesmerising sceneries, but science won’t progress unless they are shared with others. At the time of the first microscopes this could only be done by drawing images, thus requiring extensive artistic skills. Modern microscopes, on the other hand, use digital cameras, and capturing optimal micrographs instead requires a firm grasp of computer graphics. This is also needed to grasp the possibilities and potential pitfalls in digital pathology and diagnosis using image analysis algorithms. Computer graphics describes images as either raster graphics or vector graphics.1 Raster graphics images are divided into pixels, and this format is typically used for photographs stored as JPG or TIFF files. Vector graphics instead describe the image as geometrical objects and is typically used for graphs and text in EPS or PDF files. Micrographs are stored as raster graphics, but vector graphics can be used to add annotations with unlimited resolution (figure 1). Figure 1 (A) Raster graphics image of myelinated axons with annotations as vector graphics. (B) On magnification, the raster image is clearly pixelated while the vector graphics text remain in high resolution. (C) With the text ‘burned in’ to the image, the result is clearly inferior. (D) Anchor points (orange) and control lines (red) define the lines and Bezier curves that make up the vector graphics image of the number 5. Even though raster and vector graphics are conceptually very different, they handle colours in the same way.2 Since computers store information in bits, where each bit is either 0 or 1, and eight bits form …

Key concepts: Raster graphics, Vector graphics, Computer graphics (images), Computer science, Graphics, Computer graphics, 2D computer graphics, Graphics software

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Computer graphics for the microscopist — Research Paper | ScholarLens