2017•Journal of Integrated Design and Process ScienceOpen access

Design Education and Engineering Design

Kyoung-Yun Joseph Kim, Gül E. Okudan Kremer, Linda C. Schmidt

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

Engineering design has been a focus of study not only due to its practical importance for the engineering and technology development domains, but also due to its rich setting that naturally supports cognitive and behavioral investigations of designing, learning, and teaming.It mostly involves ill-structured problem solving, which makes the act of designing and design education complex.This problem context often includes fundamental design, customization, personalization, and domain specific engineering issues.The multi-stage problem solving skills, for example, can be enhanced by integrating real-world problems to the design problem context -an aspect that also brings ill-structuredness.Given the importance of engineering design, scholars from both engineering design and science of problem solving domains, and indeed many others such as education, psychology, mechanical engineering, business, artificial intelligence, contributed to the state-of-the-art on this focus.To name a few, many approaches based on various education theories, including project-based learning (PBL) (Blumenfeld et al., 1991), inquiry-based learning (Schwab, 1960;Herron, 1971), discovery learning (Bruner, 1961(Bruner, , 2009)), constructivism and constructionism (Papert 1996(Papert , 1998)), have been studied to increase our deep understanding of learners in design education domains.These approaches often consider individual and group design activities.Yet, there are aspects of designing that are still difficult to replicate in laboratory conditions and practice in classroom settings.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Engineering design has been a focus of study not only due to its practical importance for the engineering and technology development domains, but also due to its rich setting that naturally supports cognitive and behavioral investigations of designing, learning, and teaming.It mostly involves ill-structured problem solving, which makes the act of designing and design education complex.This problem context often includes fundamental design, customization, personalization, and domain specific engineering issues.The multi-stage problem solving skills, for example, can be enhanced by integrating real-world problems to the design problem context -an aspect that also brings ill-structuredness.Given the importance of engineering design, scholars from both engineering design and science of problem solving domains, and indeed many others such as education, psychology, mechanical engineering, business, artificial intelligence, contributed to the state-of-the-art on this focus.To name a few, many approaches based on various education theories, including project-based learning (PBL) (Blumenfeld et al., 1991), inquiry-based learning (Schwab, 1960;Herron, 1971), discovery learning (Bruner, 1961(Bruner, , 2009)), constructivism and constructionism (Papert 1996(Papert , 1998)), have been studied to increase our deep understanding of learners in design education domains.These approaches often consider individual and group design activities.Yet, there are aspects of designing that are still difficult to replicate in laboratory conditions and practice in classroom settings.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Engineering design has been a focus of study not only due to its practical importance for the engineering and technology development domains, but also due to its rich setting that naturally supports cognitive and behavioral investigations of designing, learning, and teaming.It mostly involves ill-structured problem solving, which makes the act of designing and design education complex.This problem context often includes fundamental design, customization, personalization, and domain specific engineering issues.The multi-stage problem solving skills, for example, can be enhanced by integrating real-world problems to the design problem context -an aspect that also brings ill-structuredness.Given the importance of engineering design, scholars from both engineering design and science of problem solving domains, and indeed many others such as education, psychology, mechanical engineering, business, artificial intelligence, contributed to the state-of-the-art on this focus.To name a few, many approaches based on various education theories, including project-based learning (PBL) (Blumenfeld et al., 1991), inquiry-based learning (Schwab, 1960;Herron, 1971), discovery learning (Bruner, 1961(Bruner, , 2009)), constructivism and constructionism (Papert 1996(Papert , 1998)), have been studied to increase our deep understanding of learners in design education domains.These approaches often consider individual and group design activities.Yet, there are aspects of designing that are still difficult to replicate in laboratory conditions and practice in classroom settings.

Key concepts: Computer science, Systems engineering, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Design Education and Engineering Design — Research Paper | ScholarLens