2017•Unpublished venueOpen access

S106 Distribution of occupational and non-occupational causes in hypersensitivity pneumonitis diagnosed by an interstitial lung disease expert panel

Justin M. Mokhlis, AS Robertson, VC Moore, PS Burge, Gareth Iestyn Walters

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this study was to describe the demographic, clinical, exposure history and investigatory Results of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) cases diagnosed by an expert regional NHS interstitial lung disease (ILD) board, to determine the extent and distribution of occupational aetiology. Methods All HP cases identified from a database over a 13 year period were included. The demographic, clinical, exposure history and investigatory Results were reviewed from clinical notes. Cases were categorised in to three groups: occupational, non-occupational and no known cause. Hypothesis testing at the 95% confidence level was used to identify significant differences between the 3 groups. Results A total of 127 cases (13 occupational; 34 non-occupational; 80 no known cause) of HP were identified. Men were more likely to experience occupational HP (p=0.029) compared to the other groups. Occupational HP cases were younger (p=0.002), more likely to experience weight loss (p=0.004), to have systemic symptoms (p=0.007) and a recurrence of symptoms (p<0.001). Occupational HP were due to metal working fluids (MWF), birds, mould/fungi, Farmer’s lung, and cleaning and treatment sprays. Non-occupational HP were due to birds, mould/fungi in the home and medication. Percentage lymphocyte count in broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) was significantly raised in occupational HP (p=0.001). Where no causative agent was identified, there was a greater absence of exposure history (13.2%–32.5%). Conclusion Occupations where there is exposure to birds or those working in trades where industrial processes and the use of chemical compounds predominate, are at risk of occupational HP. Birds remain an important cause of non-occupational HP. Clinical features such as weight loss, systemic symptoms and recurrent symptoms should raise a suspicion of an occupational cause of HP. BAL remains an important investigatory tool in HP, especially in occupational HP. An exposure history, especially an occupational history, is mandatory when assessing suspected cases of HP.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction The aim of this study was to describe the demographic, clinical, exposure history and investigatory Results of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) cases diagnosed by an expert regional NHS interstitial lung disease (ILD) board, to determine the extent and distribution of occupational aetiology. Methods All HP cases identified from a database over a 13 year period were included. The demographic, clinical, exposure history and investigatory Results were reviewed from clinical notes. Cases were categorised in to three groups: occupational, non-occupational and no known cause. Hypothesis testing at the 95% confidence level was used to identify significant differences between the 3 groups. Results A total of 127 cases (13 occupational; 34 non-occupational; 80 no known cause) of HP were identified. Men were more likely to experience occupational HP (p=0.029) compared to the other groups. Occupational HP cases were younger (p=0.002), more likely to experience weight loss (p=0.004), to have systemic symptoms (p=0.007) and a recurrence of symptoms (p<0.001). Occupational HP were due to metal working fluids (MWF), birds, mould/fungi, Farmer’s lung, and cleaning and treatment sprays. Non-occupational HP were due to birds, mould/fungi in the home and medication. Percentage lymphocyte count in broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) was significantly raised in occupational HP (p=0.001). Where no causative agent was identified, there was a greater absence of exposure history (13.2%–32.5%). Conclusion Occupations where there is exposure to birds or those working in trades where industrial processes and the use of chemical compounds predominate, are at risk of occupational HP. Birds remain an important cause of non-occupational HP. Clinical features such as weight loss, systemic symptoms and recurrent symptoms should raise a suspicion of an occupational cause of HP. BAL remains an important investigatory tool in HP, especially in occupational HP. An exposure history, especially an occupational history, is mandatory when assessing suspected cases of HP.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction The aim of this study was to describe the demographic, clinical, exposure history and investigatory Results of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) cases diagnosed by an expert regional NHS interstitial lung disease (ILD) board, to determine the extent and distribution of occupational aetiology. Methods All HP cases identified from a database over a 13 year period were included. The demographic, clinical, exposure history and investigatory Results were reviewed from clinical notes. Cases were categorised in to three groups: occupational, non-occupational and no known cause. Hypothesis testing at the 95% confidence level was used to identify significant differences between the 3 groups. Results A total of 127 cases (13 occupational; 34 non-occupational; 80 no known cause) of HP were identified. Men were more likely to experience occupational HP (p=0.029) compared to the other groups. Occupational HP cases were younger (p=0.002), more likely to experience weight loss (p=0.004), to have systemic symptoms (p=0.007) and a recurrence of symptoms (p<0.001). Occupational HP were due to metal working fluids (MWF), birds, mould/fungi, Farmer’s lung, and cleaning and treatment sprays. Non-occupational HP were due to birds, mould/fungi in the home and medication. Percentage lymphocyte count in broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) was significantly raised in occupational HP (p=0.001). Where no causative agent was identified, there was a greater absence of exposure history (13.2%–32.5%). Conclusion Occupations where there is exposure to birds or those working in trades where industrial processes and the use of chemical compounds predominate, are at risk of occupational HP. Birds remain an important cause of non-occupational HP. Clinical features such as weight loss, systemic symptoms and recurrent symptoms should raise a suspicion of an occupational cause of HP. BAL remains an important investigatory tool in HP, especially in occupational HP. An exposure history, especially an occupational history, is mandatory when assessing suspected cases of HP.

Key concepts: Hypersensitivity pneumonitis, Medicine, Occupational lung disease, Interstitial lung disease, Etiology, Occupational disease, Occupational exposure, Occupational asthma

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
S106 Distribution of occupational and non-occupational causes in hypersensitivity pneumonitis diagnosed by an interstitial lung disease expert panel — Research Paper | ScholarLens