A Cross-linguistic Approach to the'Erroneous' Genitive Subjects: Underspecification of Tense in ChildGrammar Revisited
Naoko Sawada, Keiko Murasugi
Abstract
Naoko Sawada, Keiko Murasugi
Abstract
As in (3), the subject NP Taroo can be marked with genitive Case as well as nominative Case. Likewise, the genitive subjects, John s and my, are possible in the English gerundive construction, as shown in (4). What causes Case errors in child grammar? In this paper, providing new descriptive findings from the CHILDES corpora and the data reported in the previous studies, we argue that the Case errors that young children make are related to the underspecification of the features in Tense. We will show that in
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
As in (3), the subject NP Taroo can be marked with genitive Case as well as nominative Case. Likewise, the genitive subjects, John s and my, are possible in the English gerundive construction, as shown in (4). What causes Case errors in child grammar? In this paper, providing new descriptive findings from the CHILDES corpora and the data reported in the previous studies, we argue that the Case errors that young children make are related to the underspecification of the features in Tense. We will show that in
Key concepts: Genitive case, Underspecification, Linguistics, Nominative case, Grammar, Subject (documents), Psychology, Computer science