Federal Taxation of State Activities and State Taxation of Federal Activities
Julius Cohen, Kenneth Dayton
Abstract
Open-access reader
Julius Cohen, Kenneth Dayton
Abstract
Open-access reader
A See Haminer v. Dagenbart (i918) 247 U. S. 251, 38 Sup.Ct. 529; Bailey v. Drexel Furn.Co. (I922) 259 U. S. 20, 42 Sup.Ct. 449.6 For a collection of decisions involving statutes in which the revenue from taxation was a secondary consideration and its social consequence the primary one, see (1922) 22 CoL.L. REV.659.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A See Haminer v. Dagenbart (i918) 247 U. S. 251, 38 Sup.Ct. 529; Bailey v. Drexel Furn.Co. (I922) 259 U. S. 20, 42 Sup.Ct. 449.6 For a collection of decisions involving statutes in which the revenue from taxation was a secondary consideration and its social consequence the primary one, see (1922) 22 CoL.L. REV.659.
Key concepts: State (computer science), Federal state, Business, Economic policy, Computer science, Algorithm