2017Crop ScienceRequires access

Photosynthesis and Growth of Camelina and Canola in Response to Water Deficit and Applied Nitrogen

Libiao Gao, C. D. Caldwell, Yunfei Jiang

Open publisher page 45 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nitrogen (N) and water availabilities are two important environmental factors affecting crop growth and yield. Effects of applied N and water deficit imposition on photosynthesis rate (Pn), transpiration rate ( E ), stomatal conductance ( g s ), and shoot and root biomass accumulation in camelina [ Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] and canola ( Brassica napus L.) were compared in a greenhouse. Water deficit significantly decreased Pn, E , g s , and shoot/root biomass ratio in both crops. The relative reduction of Pn, E , and g s caused by water deficit was greater in canola than in camelina. Under drought conditions, applied N enhanced Pn and g s but had less pronounced effects on E in camelina. Camelina maintained higher Pn at N levels >125 kg N ha −1 under water deficit. In contrast, when exposed to drought, applied N decreased Pn, E , and g s in canola. The shoot/root ratio was more responsive to applied N in camelina, whereas applied N did not affect the shoot/root ratio in canola. Under drought conditions, camelina maintained a higher shoot/root ratio than canola. These results suggest that camelina is more tolerant to drought stress and potentially has greater adaptability to dryland production than canola.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT Nitrogen (N) and water availabilities are two important environmental factors affecting crop growth and yield. Effects of applied N and water deficit imposition on photosynthesis rate (Pn), transpiration rate ( E ), stomatal conductance ( g s ), and shoot and root biomass accumulation in camelina [ Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] and canola ( Brassica napus L.) were compared in a greenhouse. Water deficit significantly decreased Pn, E , g s , and shoot/root biomass ratio in both crops. The relative reduction of Pn, E , and g s caused by water deficit was greater in canola than in camelina. Under drought conditions, applied N enhanced Pn and g s but had less pronounced effects on E in camelina. Camelina maintained higher Pn at N levels >125 kg N ha −1 under water deficit. In contrast, when exposed to drought, applied N decreased Pn, E , and g s in canola. The shoot/root ratio was more responsive to applied N in camelina, whereas applied N did not affect the shoot/root ratio in canola. Under drought conditions, camelina maintained a higher shoot/root ratio than canola. These results suggest that camelina is more tolerant to drought stress and potentially has greater adaptability to dryland production than canola.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 45 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT Nitrogen (N) and water availabilities are two important environmental factors affecting crop growth and yield. Effects of applied N and water deficit imposition on photosynthesis rate (Pn), transpiration rate ( E ), stomatal conductance ( g s ), and shoot and root biomass accumulation in camelina [ Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] and canola ( Brassica napus L.) were compared in a greenhouse. Water deficit significantly decreased Pn, E , g s , and shoot/root biomass ratio in both crops. The relative reduction of Pn, E , and g s caused by water deficit was greater in canola than in camelina. Under drought conditions, applied N enhanced Pn and g s but had less pronounced effects on E in camelina. Camelina maintained higher Pn at N levels >125 kg N ha −1 under water deficit. In contrast, when exposed to drought, applied N decreased Pn, E , and g s in canola. The shoot/root ratio was more responsive to applied N in camelina, whereas applied N did not affect the shoot/root ratio in canola. Under drought conditions, camelina maintained a higher shoot/root ratio than canola. These results suggest that camelina is more tolerant to drought stress and potentially has greater adaptability to dryland production than canola.

Key concepts: Camelina, Camelina sativa, Canola, Shoot, Biology, Transpiration, Agronomy, Brassica

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Photosynthesis and Growth of Camelina and Canola in Response to Water Deficit and Applied Nitrogen — Research Paper | ScholarLens