2017Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Phylogenomics: Constructing Species Phylogenies from Multi-Locus Data

Tandy Warnow

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Introduction One of the fascinating challenges in estimating the evolutionary history of a set of species is that different regions within the genomes can evolve differently due to various biological phenomena (Maddison, 1997; Mallo and Posada, 2016; Posada, 2016). One of the most obvious causes for this difference is horizontal gene transfer (Syvanen, 1985), whereby DNA is transferred from the genome of one species into that of another. Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is especially frequent among prokaryotes (Gogarten et al., 2002), but occurs in other organisms as well. While it can be argued that a species tree is useful as a model (Mindell, 2013) and can make sense in the presence of HGT (even for prokaryotes) if it is based on genes that are resistant to HGT, a full depiction of evolutionary history when HGT has occurred requires a more general graphical model called a “phylogenetic network” (Morrison, 2014a). Hybrid speciation, where two different species have viable offspring, is another biological process that requires a phylogenetic network. Well-known examples of hybridization include mules and hinnies (which are hybrids of horses and donkeys) and ligers and tigons (which are the hybrid offspring of lions and tigers). Hybrid speciation has long been known to be common in plants (Rieseberg, 1997), and its extent in other organisms is increasingly apparent (Pennisi, 2016). Like HGT, a proper representation of the evolutionary history of a dataset in which hybridization appears requires a phylogenetic network, rather than a tree. There are also biological processes that cause different parts of the genomes to evolve differently, but where the species history is still correctly modeled as a tree. For example, under a gene duplication and loss model (Ohno, 1970), a gene evolves within the branches of a species tree with duplication events (that increase the number of copies of the gene within a lineage) and loss events (that reduce the number of copies of a gene), so that a given species can have multiple copies of the same gene within its genome. Another process that can create discordance with the species tree is the multi-species coalescent (MSC) model (Maddison, 1997; Pamilo and Nei, 1998) (i.e., the multi-species version of the coalescent process), which models how alleles segregate into populations, and so reflects population-level processes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction One of the fascinating challenges in estimating the evolutionary history of a set of species is that different regions within the genomes can evolve differently due to various biological phenomena (Maddison, 1997; Mallo and Posada, 2016; Posada, 2016). One of the most obvious causes for this difference is horizontal gene transfer (Syvanen, 1985), whereby DNA is transferred from the genome of one species into that of another. Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is especially frequent among prokaryotes (Gogarten et al., 2002), but occurs in other organisms as well. While it can be argued that a species tree is useful as a model (Mindell, 2013) and can make sense in the presence of HGT (even for prokaryotes) if it is based on genes that are resistant to HGT, a full depiction of evolutionary history when HGT has occurred requires a more general graphical model called a “phylogenetic network” (Morrison, 2014a). Hybrid speciation, where two different species have viable offspring, is another biological process that requires a phylogenetic network. Well-known examples of hybridization include mules and hinnies (which are hybrids of horses and donkeys) and ligers and tigons (which are the hybrid offspring of lions and tigers). Hybrid speciation has long been known to be common in plants (Rieseberg, 1997), and its extent in other organisms is increasingly apparent (Pennisi, 2016). Like HGT, a proper representation of the evolutionary history of a dataset in which hybridization appears requires a phylogenetic network, rather than a tree. There are also biological processes that cause different parts of the genomes to evolve differently, but where the species history is still correctly modeled as a tree. For example, under a gene duplication and loss model (Ohno, 1970), a gene evolves within the branches of a species tree with duplication events (that increase the number of copies of the gene within a lineage) and loss events (that reduce the number of copies of a gene), so that a given species can have multiple copies of the same gene within its genome. Another process that can create discordance with the species tree is the multi-species coalescent (MSC) model (Maddison, 1997; Pamilo and Nei, 1998) (i.e., the multi-species version of the coalescent process), which models how alleles segregate into populations, and so reflects population-level processes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction One of the fascinating challenges in estimating the evolutionary history of a set of species is that different regions within the genomes can evolve differently due to various biological phenomena (Maddison, 1997; Mallo and Posada, 2016; Posada, 2016). One of the most obvious causes for this difference is horizontal gene transfer (Syvanen, 1985), whereby DNA is transferred from the genome of one species into that of another. Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is especially frequent among prokaryotes (Gogarten et al., 2002), but occurs in other organisms as well. While it can be argued that a species tree is useful as a model (Mindell, 2013) and can make sense in the presence of HGT (even for prokaryotes) if it is based on genes that are resistant to HGT, a full depiction of evolutionary history when HGT has occurred requires a more general graphical model called a “phylogenetic network” (Morrison, 2014a). Hybrid speciation, where two different species have viable offspring, is another biological process that requires a phylogenetic network. Well-known examples of hybridization include mules and hinnies (which are hybrids of horses and donkeys) and ligers and tigons (which are the hybrid offspring of lions and tigers). Hybrid speciation has long been known to be common in plants (Rieseberg, 1997), and its extent in other organisms is increasingly apparent (Pennisi, 2016). Like HGT, a proper representation of the evolutionary history of a dataset in which hybridization appears requires a phylogenetic network, rather than a tree. There are also biological processes that cause different parts of the genomes to evolve differently, but where the species history is still correctly modeled as a tree. For example, under a gene duplication and loss model (Ohno, 1970), a gene evolves within the branches of a species tree with duplication events (that increase the number of copies of the gene within a lineage) and loss events (that reduce the number of copies of a gene), so that a given species can have multiple copies of the same gene within its genome. Another process that can create discordance with the species tree is the multi-species coalescent (MSC) model (Maddison, 1997; Pamilo and Nei, 1998) (i.e., the multi-species version of the coalescent process), which models how alleles segregate into populations, and so reflects population-level processes.

Key concepts: Horizontal gene transfer, Phylogenomics, Phylogenetic tree, Tree of life (biology), Evolutionary biology, Biology, Genome, Phylogenetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Phylogenomics: Constructing Species Phylogenies from Multi-Locus Data — Research Paper | ScholarLens