2017Zentralblatt für Chirurgie - Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Viszeral- Thorax- und GefäßchirurgieRequires access

VATS pleurectomy vs. VATS pleural abrasion: significant reduction of pneumothorax recurrence rates after pleurectomy

C Ng, Herbert Maier, Silvia Jud, Florian Kocher, Paolo Lucciarini, Thomas Schmid, Florian Augustin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: Surgical treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) consists of bullectomy and any form pleurodesis. Whether pleurectomy is superior to pleural abrasion is still a matter of debate with recurrence rates especially high when performed with a VATS approach. Aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the two methods in prevention of recurrence of pneumothorax in a minimally invasive setting. Material and Methods: From 01/2005 to 12/2015, 110 patients younger than 40 years with PSP underwent thoracoscopic wedge resections either with apical partial pleurectomy or pleural abrasion. Medical records of patients were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Pleural abrasion after thoracoscopic bullectomy was performed in 35/110 patients, 75/110 patients underwent partial pleurectomy. Median age was 24 (16 – 40) years in both groups, 67.3% (74/110) were male and median BMI was 19.8 kg/m 2 (16.4 – 28.7 kg/m2). At the time of surgery, percentage of active smokers was comparable between the groups (pleurectomy group 46.7%, pleural abrasion group 50%; p = 0.4549). Median drainage duration was 4 (2 – 7) days and did not differ between the two groups (0.3437). Length of hospital stay was median 5 (2 – 13) vs. 6 (3 – 11) days in the pleural abrasion and pleurectomy group, respectively. There was no significant difference in major postoperative complications (p = 0.3022). Ten (9%) patients had a recurrence of pneumothorax during follow up. Incidence of recurrence in those undergoing pleural abrasion (9/35) was significantly higher than those undergoing apical pleurectomy (1/75, p = 0.00012). Conclusion: In our analysis, partial pleurectomy even though performed with VATS proved to be effective and a safe method for prevention of recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax. Patients in the pleurectomy group did show a statistically significant lower rate of recurrence than patients in the pleural abrasion group without adding morbidity or prolonging hospital stay.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: Surgical treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) consists of bullectomy and any form pleurodesis. Whether pleurectomy is superior to pleural abrasion is still a matter of debate with recurrence rates especially high when performed with a VATS approach. Aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the two methods in prevention of recurrence of pneumothorax in a minimally invasive setting. Material and Methods: From 01/2005 to 12/2015, 110 patients younger than 40 years with PSP underwent thoracoscopic wedge resections either with apical partial pleurectomy or pleural abrasion. Medical records of patients were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Pleural abrasion after thoracoscopic bullectomy was performed in 35/110 patients, 75/110 patients underwent partial pleurectomy. Median age was 24 (16 – 40) years in both groups, 67.3% (74/110) were male and median BMI was 19.8 kg/m 2 (16.4 – 28.7 kg/m2). At the time of surgery, percentage of active smokers was comparable between the groups (pleurectomy group 46.7%, pleural abrasion group 50%; p = 0.4549). Median drainage duration was 4 (2 – 7) days and did not differ between the two groups (0.3437). Length of hospital stay was median 5 (2 – 13) vs. 6 (3 – 11) days in the pleural abrasion and pleurectomy group, respectively. There was no significant difference in major postoperative complications (p = 0.3022). Ten (9%) patients had a recurrence of pneumothorax during follow up. Incidence of recurrence in those undergoing pleural abrasion (9/35) was significantly higher than those undergoing apical pleurectomy (1/75, p = 0.00012). Conclusion: In our analysis, partial pleurectomy even though performed with VATS proved to be effective and a safe method for prevention of recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax. Patients in the pleurectomy group did show a statistically significant lower rate of recurrence than patients in the pleural abrasion group without adding morbidity or prolonging hospital stay.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: Surgical treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) consists of bullectomy and any form pleurodesis. Whether pleurectomy is superior to pleural abrasion is still a matter of debate with recurrence rates especially high when performed with a VATS approach. Aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the two methods in prevention of recurrence of pneumothorax in a minimally invasive setting. Material and Methods: From 01/2005 to 12/2015, 110 patients younger than 40 years with PSP underwent thoracoscopic wedge resections either with apical partial pleurectomy or pleural abrasion. Medical records of patients were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Pleural abrasion after thoracoscopic bullectomy was performed in 35/110 patients, 75/110 patients underwent partial pleurectomy. Median age was 24 (16 – 40) years in both groups, 67.3% (74/110) were male and median BMI was 19.8 kg/m 2 (16.4 – 28.7 kg/m2). At the time of surgery, percentage of active smokers was comparable between the groups (pleurectomy group 46.7%, pleural abrasion group 50%; p = 0.4549). Median drainage duration was 4 (2 – 7) days and did not differ between the two groups (0.3437). Length of hospital stay was median 5 (2 – 13) vs. 6 (3 – 11) days in the pleural abrasion and pleurectomy group, respectively. There was no significant difference in major postoperative complications (p = 0.3022). Ten (9%) patients had a recurrence of pneumothorax during follow up. Incidence of recurrence in those undergoing pleural abrasion (9/35) was significantly higher than those undergoing apical pleurectomy (1/75, p = 0.00012). Conclusion: In our analysis, partial pleurectomy even though performed with VATS proved to be effective and a safe method for prevention of recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax. Patients in the pleurectomy group did show a statistically significant lower rate of recurrence than patients in the pleural abrasion group without adding morbidity or prolonging hospital stay.

Key concepts: Pleurectomy, Medicine, Pleurodesis, Pneumothorax, Surgery, Thoracoscopy, Mesothelioma, Peritoneal mesothelioma

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
VATS pleurectomy vs. VATS pleural abrasion: significant reduction of pneumothorax recurrence rates after pleurectomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens