2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Using Precise Taint Tracking for Auto-sanitization

Tejas Saoji, Thomas H. Austin, Cormac Flanagan

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

Taint analysis has been used in numerous scripting languages such as Perl and Ruby to defend against various form of code injection attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS) and SQL-injection. However, most taint analysis systems simply fail when tainted information is used in a possibly unsafe manner. In this paper, we explore how precise taint tracking can be used in order to secure web content. Rather than simply crashing, we propose that a library-writer defined sanitization function can instead be used on the tainted portions of a string. With this approach, library writers or framework developers can design their tools to be resilient, even if inexperienced developers misuse these libraries in unsafe ways. In other words, developer mistakes do not have to result in system crashes to guarantee security. We implement both coarse-grained and precise taint tracking in JavaScript, and show how our precise taint tracking API can be used to defend against SQL injection and XSS attacks. We further evaluate the performance of this approach, showing that precise taint tracking involves an overhead of approximately 22%.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Taint analysis has been used in numerous scripting languages such as Perl and Ruby to defend against various form of code injection attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS) and SQL-injection. However, most taint analysis systems simply fail when tainted information is used in a possibly unsafe manner. In this paper, we explore how precise taint tracking can be used in order to secure web content. Rather than simply crashing, we propose that a library-writer defined sanitization function can instead be used on the tainted portions of a string. With this approach, library writers or framework developers can design their tools to be resilient, even if inexperienced developers misuse these libraries in unsafe ways. In other words, developer mistakes do not have to result in system crashes to guarantee security. We implement both coarse-grained and precise taint tracking in JavaScript, and show how our precise taint tracking API can be used to defend against SQL injection and XSS attacks. We further evaluate the performance of this approach, showing that precise taint tracking involves an overhead of approximately 22%.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Taint analysis has been used in numerous scripting languages such as Perl and Ruby to defend against various form of code injection attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS) and SQL-injection. However, most taint analysis systems simply fail when tainted information is used in a possibly unsafe manner. In this paper, we explore how precise taint tracking can be used in order to secure web content. Rather than simply crashing, we propose that a library-writer defined sanitization function can instead be used on the tainted portions of a string. With this approach, library writers or framework developers can design their tools to be resilient, even if inexperienced developers misuse these libraries in unsafe ways. In other words, developer mistakes do not have to result in system crashes to guarantee security. We implement both coarse-grained and precise taint tracking in JavaScript, and show how our precise taint tracking API can be used to defend against SQL injection and XSS attacks. We further evaluate the performance of this approach, showing that precise taint tracking involves an overhead of approximately 22%.

Key concepts: Cross-site scripting, Taint checking, Computer science, Scripting language, SQL injection, JavaScript, Perl, Computer security

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Using Precise Taint Tracking for Auto-sanitization — Research Paper | ScholarLens