Adam Smith as New Founder of The Austrian School of Economics: Reinterpreting Menger’s Critique of Smith as An Immanent Critique
Clynton Lopez
Abstract
Clynton Lopez
Abstract
Although Carl Menger is regarded as the founder of the Austrian School of Economics, I argue that the founding of the Austrian School can be traced directly back to Adam Smith. Rather than transcend Smith’s theoretical framework, Menger developed an immanent critique of the Smithian propostion that increasing specialization under the division of labor is the main cause of economic development. I argue that Menger’s nascent theory of capital extends, rather than transcends, this Smithian proposition. From this perspective, accumulations of capital are a by-product of more fine-grained specialization under the division of labor.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Although Carl Menger is regarded as the founder of the Austrian School of Economics, I argue that the founding of the Austrian School can be traced directly back to Adam Smith. Rather than transcend Smith’s theoretical framework, Menger developed an immanent critique of the Smithian propostion that increasing specialization under the division of labor is the main cause of economic development. I argue that Menger’s nascent theory of capital extends, rather than transcends, this Smithian proposition. From this perspective, accumulations of capital are a by-product of more fine-grained specialization under the division of labor.
Key concepts: Adam smith, Division of labour, Austrian School, Neoclassical economics, Proposition, Capital (architecture), Economic science, Economics