2015Unpublished venueRequires access

Allgeyer v. Louisiana (1897)

David Schultz, John R. Vile

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

In Allgeyer v. Louisiana, 165 US 578, a unanimous US Supreme Court established the doctrine of "liberty of contract." Like most constitutional doctrines, liberty of contract—or the Allgeyer doctrine, as it became known—had a lineage predating its formal articulation. American judges amplified the concept of due process beyond only procedural matters to include a substantive limitation against arbitrary government action. The specific sources of such substantive limitations remained vague, with US courts referring variously to the character of legislatures, to natural-law principles, or to the common law, primarily to insulate the private ordering of economic relations-contracts and property rights-from government regulation. The specific liberty-of-contract doctrine articulated in the Allgeyer-Lochner-Adair decisions ultimately was rejected by the Supreme Court in 1937. The underlying notion that due process imposed sub-stantive as well as formal limitations on government remained viable.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In Allgeyer v. Louisiana, 165 US 578, a unanimous US Supreme Court established the doctrine of "liberty of contract." Like most constitutional doctrines, liberty of contract—or the Allgeyer doctrine, as it became known—had a lineage predating its formal articulation. American judges amplified the concept of due process beyond only procedural matters to include a substantive limitation against arbitrary government action. The specific sources of such substantive limitations remained vague, with US courts referring variously to the character of legislatures, to natural-law principles, or to the common law, primarily to insulate the private ordering of economic relations-contracts and property rights-from government regulation. The specific liberty-of-contract doctrine articulated in the Allgeyer-Lochner-Adair decisions ultimately was rejected by the Supreme Court in 1937. The underlying notion that due process imposed sub-stantive as well as formal limitations on government remained viable.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In Allgeyer v. Louisiana, 165 US 578, a unanimous US Supreme Court established the doctrine of "liberty of contract." Like most constitutional doctrines, liberty of contract—or the Allgeyer doctrine, as it became known—had a lineage predating its formal articulation. American judges amplified the concept of due process beyond only procedural matters to include a substantive limitation against arbitrary government action. The specific sources of such substantive limitations remained vague, with US courts referring variously to the character of legislatures, to natural-law principles, or to the common law, primarily to insulate the private ordering of economic relations-contracts and property rights-from government regulation. The specific liberty-of-contract doctrine articulated in the Allgeyer-Lochner-Adair decisions ultimately was rejected by the Supreme Court in 1937. The underlying notion that due process imposed sub-stantive as well as formal limitations on government remained viable.

Key concepts: History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Allgeyer v. Louisiana (1897) — Research Paper | ScholarLens