2016Academy of Management ProceedingsRequires access

Strategy Making 'In Time'

Jenni Myllykoski, Anniina Rantakari

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper examines temporality in managerial strategy making. We build on the ontology of becoming to elucidate the temporal nature of strategy making. In our elaboration, we adopt an 'in time' view on temporality, according to which past, present and future always co-exist in the experience of temporality. We further draw on the notion that time has agency in determining organizational processes to depart from the notions of objective and subjective time and temporality. Through a longitudinal, real time study in a small Finnish software company, we empirically illustrate how managerial strategy making is inherently bound to a temporality paradox arising from the managers being engaged with two controversial times: they use linear, extended time as artefact in strategy making and 'over time' planning, while experiencing the real, non-linear passing of time, the becoming 'in time'. We further show that strategy making is essentially bound to 'in time' problematizing of the present continuities organized around the linear temporality. Therefore, we argue that temporality should not be treated merely as a subjective managerial orientation or separate aspect in strategy making, but as fundamental characteristic of reality defining the dynamics of strategy making.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper examines temporality in managerial strategy making. We build on the ontology of becoming to elucidate the temporal nature of strategy making. In our elaboration, we adopt an 'in time' view on temporality, according to which past, present and future always co-exist in the experience of temporality. We further draw on the notion that time has agency in determining organizational processes to depart from the notions of objective and subjective time and temporality. Through a longitudinal, real time study in a small Finnish software company, we empirically illustrate how managerial strategy making is inherently bound to a temporality paradox arising from the managers being engaged with two controversial times: they use linear, extended time as artefact in strategy making and 'over time' planning, while experiencing the real, non-linear passing of time, the becoming 'in time'. We further show that strategy making is essentially bound to 'in time' problematizing of the present continuities organized around the linear temporality. Therefore, we argue that temporality should not be treated merely as a subjective managerial orientation or separate aspect in strategy making, but as fundamental characteristic of reality defining the dynamics of strategy making.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper examines temporality in managerial strategy making. We build on the ontology of becoming to elucidate the temporal nature of strategy making. In our elaboration, we adopt an 'in time' view on temporality, according to which past, present and future always co-exist in the experience of temporality. We further draw on the notion that time has agency in determining organizational processes to depart from the notions of objective and subjective time and temporality. Through a longitudinal, real time study in a small Finnish software company, we empirically illustrate how managerial strategy making is inherently bound to a temporality paradox arising from the managers being engaged with two controversial times: they use linear, extended time as artefact in strategy making and 'over time' planning, while experiencing the real, non-linear passing of time, the becoming 'in time'. We further show that strategy making is essentially bound to 'in time' problematizing of the present continuities organized around the linear temporality. Therefore, we argue that temporality should not be treated merely as a subjective managerial orientation or separate aspect in strategy making, but as fundamental characteristic of reality defining the dynamics of strategy making.

Key concepts: Temporality, Agency (philosophy), Epistemology, Computer science, Sociology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Strategy Making 'In Time' — Research Paper | ScholarLens