1993•Coastal Zone '93Requires access

Natural Resource Damage Case Selection Criteria

James Jeansonne, Norman Meade

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A number of practical considerations dictate that only a fraction of all potential natural resource claims are actually negotiated or litigated under Federal statutes that provides for recovery of damages for natural resources injuries. This paper describes the initial steps taken by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to evaluate releases of oil and hazardous substances to determine whether to pursue a damage assessment. Key questions that are addressed in the case evaluation process include: significance of injury; assessment costs vs. expected damages; viability of potentially responsible party(s); potential for restoration; and litigation risks.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A number of practical considerations dictate that only a fraction of all potential natural resource claims are actually negotiated or litigated under Federal statutes that provides for recovery of damages for natural resources injuries. This paper describes the initial steps taken by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to evaluate releases of oil and hazardous substances to determine whether to pursue a damage assessment. Key questions that are addressed in the case evaluation process include: significance of injury; assessment costs vs. expected damages; viability of potentially responsible party(s); potential for restoration; and litigation risks.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A number of practical considerations dictate that only a fraction of all potential natural resource claims are actually negotiated or litigated under Federal statutes that provides for recovery of damages for natural resources injuries. This paper describes the initial steps taken by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to evaluate releases of oil and hazardous substances to determine whether to pursue a damage assessment. Key questions that are addressed in the case evaluation process include: significance of injury; assessment costs vs. expected damages; viability of potentially responsible party(s); potential for restoration; and litigation risks.

Key concepts: Damages, Natural resource, Hazardous waste, Resource (disambiguation), Statute, Process (computing), Natural (archaeology), Risk analysis (engineering)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Natural Resource Damage Case Selection Criteria — Research Paper | ScholarLens