Natural Resource Damage Case Selection Criteria
James Jeansonne, Norman Meade
Abstract
James Jeansonne, Norman Meade
Abstract
A number of practical considerations dictate that only a fraction of all potential natural resource claims are actually negotiated or litigated under Federal statutes that provides for recovery of damages for natural resources injuries. This paper describes the initial steps taken by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to evaluate releases of oil and hazardous substances to determine whether to pursue a damage assessment. Key questions that are addressed in the case evaluation process include: significance of injury; assessment costs vs. expected damages; viability of potentially responsible party(s); potential for restoration; and litigation risks.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A number of practical considerations dictate that only a fraction of all potential natural resource claims are actually negotiated or litigated under Federal statutes that provides for recovery of damages for natural resources injuries. This paper describes the initial steps taken by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to evaluate releases of oil and hazardous substances to determine whether to pursue a damage assessment. Key questions that are addressed in the case evaluation process include: significance of injury; assessment costs vs. expected damages; viability of potentially responsible party(s); potential for restoration; and litigation risks.
Key concepts: Damages, Natural resource, Hazardous waste, Resource (disambiguation), Statute, Process (computing), Natural (archaeology), Risk analysis (engineering)