2017Management ScienceRequires access

High-Powered Performance Pay and Crowding Out of Nonmonetary Motives

David Huffman, Michael L. Bognanno

Open publisher page 29 citations

Abstract

A previous literature cautions that paying workers for performance might crowd out nonmonetary motives to work hard. Empirical evidence from the field, however, has been based on between-subjects designs that are best suited for detecting crowding out due to low-powered incentives. High-powered incentives in the workplace tend to increase output, but it is unknown whether this masks crowding out. This paper uses a within-subject experimental design and finds evidence that crowding out also extends to high-powered incentives in a real work setting with paid workers. There is individual heterogeneity, however, with a minority of workers reporting crowding in of motivation. Thus, the impact of performance pay might depend on the mix of worker types. Data and the online appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2846 . This paper was accepted by Uri Gneezy, behavioral economics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A previous literature cautions that paying workers for performance might crowd out nonmonetary motives to work hard. Empirical evidence from the field, however, has been based on between-subjects designs that are best suited for detecting crowding out due to low-powered incentives. High-powered incentives in the workplace tend to increase output, but it is unknown whether this masks crowding out. This paper uses a within-subject experimental design and finds evidence that crowding out also extends to high-powered incentives in a real work setting with paid workers. There is individual heterogeneity, however, with a minority of workers reporting crowding in of motivation. Thus, the impact of performance pay might depend on the mix of worker types. Data and the online appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2846 . This paper was accepted by Uri Gneezy, behavioral economics.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A previous literature cautions that paying workers for performance might crowd out nonmonetary motives to work hard. Empirical evidence from the field, however, has been based on between-subjects designs that are best suited for detecting crowding out due to low-powered incentives. High-powered incentives in the workplace tend to increase output, but it is unknown whether this masks crowding out. This paper uses a within-subject experimental design and finds evidence that crowding out also extends to high-powered incentives in a real work setting with paid workers. There is individual heterogeneity, however, with a minority of workers reporting crowding in of motivation. Thus, the impact of performance pay might depend on the mix of worker types. Data and the online appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2846 . This paper was accepted by Uri Gneezy, behavioral economics.

Key concepts: Crowding, Incentive, Crowding out, Empirical evidence, Work (physics), Economics, Public economics, Microeconomics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
High-Powered Performance Pay and Crowding Out of Nonmonetary Motives — Research Paper | ScholarLens