2012•Frontiers of BiogeographyOpen access

from the members: On the biogeography of biogeographers

Seline S. Meijer

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

possible scales of analysis of the distribution of life across space, and how, through time, it has changed" (Whittaker et al. 2005).It is a long established field of research, with its roots in the early nineteenth century.Recently, the fifth IBS International Meeting was held in Irakleion, Crete, where the latest scientific research in relation to biogeography was presented by biogeographers from around the world.The list of topics covered in this conference was comprehensive: there were four symposia covering Mediterranean biogeography, comparative phylogeography, biogeography and ecology, and analytical advancements in macroecology and biogeography; and six sessions with contributed papers on island biogeography, climate change biogeography, conservation biogeography, palaeoecology, marine biogeography and hot topics in biogeography.Overall, there were 63 talks and 271 poster presentations covering a wide range of biogeographical topics.However I noticed that the geographical origin of the attendees of the conference was less diverse: the majority were from the US and Europe and I was surprised to see only a few researchers from South America and Asia and practically none from Africa.In a relatively advanced field such as biogeography, concerned with distribution patterns, I found it slightly ironic that the diversity of the biogeographers at this meeting was relatively low.Out of the total of 334 contributions at the meeting, nearly 60 percent of the authors came from a European institution and 26 percent from North American ones, whereas 7 percent of the first authors came from Central and South America, just about 5 percent from Asia, 2 percent from Oceania, and only 0.3 percent from Africa.So I wondered: where were our colleagues from these regions?I wanted to know whether the low proportion of researchers from outside of Europe and North America at the IBS meeting is representative for the wider academic biogeography community, so I investigated recent contributions pub-

About this research paper

What this paper is about

possible scales of analysis of the distribution of life across space, and how, through time, it has changed" (Whittaker et al. 2005).It is a long established field of research, with its roots in the early nineteenth century.Recently, the fifth IBS International Meeting was held in Irakleion, Crete, where the latest scientific research in relation to biogeography was presented by biogeographers from around the world.The list of topics covered in this conference was comprehensive: there were four symposia covering Mediterranean biogeography, comparative phylogeography, biogeography and ecology, and analytical advancements in macroecology and biogeography; and six sessions with contributed papers on island biogeography, climate change biogeography, conservation biogeography, palaeoecology, marine biogeography and hot topics in biogeography.Overall, there were 63 talks and 271 poster presentations covering a wide range of biogeographical topics.However I noticed that the geographical origin of the attendees of the conference was less diverse: the majority were from the US and Europe and I was surprised to see only a few researchers from South America and Asia and practically none from Africa.In a relatively advanced field such as biogeography, concerned with distribution patterns, I found it slightly ironic that the diversity of the biogeographers at this meeting was relatively low.Out of the total of 334 contributions at the meeting, nearly 60 percent of the authors came from a European institution and 26 percent from North American ones, whereas 7 percent of the first authors came from Central and South America, just about 5 percent from Asia, 2 percent from Oceania, and only 0.3 percent from Africa.So I wondered: where were our colleagues from these regions?I wanted to know whether the low proportion of researchers from outside of Europe and North America at the IBS meeting is representative for the wider academic biogeography community, so I investigated recent contributions pub-

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

possible scales of analysis of the distribution of life across space, and how, through time, it has changed" (Whittaker et al. 2005).It is a long established field of research, with its roots in the early nineteenth century.Recently, the fifth IBS International Meeting was held in Irakleion, Crete, where the latest scientific research in relation to biogeography was presented by biogeographers from around the world.The list of topics covered in this conference was comprehensive: there were four symposia covering Mediterranean biogeography, comparative phylogeography, biogeography and ecology, and analytical advancements in macroecology and biogeography; and six sessions with contributed papers on island biogeography, climate change biogeography, conservation biogeography, palaeoecology, marine biogeography and hot topics in biogeography.Overall, there were 63 talks and 271 poster presentations covering a wide range of biogeographical topics.However I noticed that the geographical origin of the attendees of the conference was less diverse: the majority were from the US and Europe and I was surprised to see only a few researchers from South America and Asia and practically none from Africa.In a relatively advanced field such as biogeography, concerned with distribution patterns, I found it slightly ironic that the diversity of the biogeographers at this meeting was relatively low.Out of the total of 334 contributions at the meeting, nearly 60 percent of the authors came from a European institution and 26 percent from North American ones, whereas 7 percent of the first authors came from Central and South America, just about 5 percent from Asia, 2 percent from Oceania, and only 0.3 percent from Africa.So I wondered: where were our colleagues from these regions?I wanted to know whether the low proportion of researchers from outside of Europe and North America at the IBS meeting is representative for the wider academic biogeography community, so I investigated recent contributions pub-

Key concepts: Biogeography, Ecology, Biology, Insular biogeography, Phylogeography, Mediterranean Islands, Mediterranean climate, Phylogenetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
from the members: On the biogeography of biogeographers — Research Paper | ScholarLens