2017•Cellular Physiology and BiochemistryOpen access

Allele Drop Out Conferred by a Frequent CYP2D6 Genetic Variation For Commonly Used CYP2D6*3 Genotyping Assays

Giada Scantamburlo, Konstantina Tziolia, Michaela Zopf, Emanuele Bernardinelli, Selma M. Soyal, Davide Antonio Civello, Simone Vanoni, Silvia Dossena, Wolfgang Patsch, George P. Patrinos, Markus Paulmichl, Charity Nofziger

Open full text 15 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Accurate genotyping of CYP2D6 is challenging due to its inherent genetic variation, copy number variation (duplications and deletions) and hybrid formation with highly homologous pseudogenes. Because a relatively high percentage (∼25%) of clinically prescribed drugs are substrates for this enzyme, accurate determination of its genotype for phenotype prediction is essential. METHODS: A cohort of 365 patient samples was genotyped for CYP2D6 using Sanger sequencing (as the gold standard), hydrolysis probe assays or pyrosequencing. RESULTS: A discrepant result between the three genotyping methods for the loss of function CYP2D6*3 (g.2549delA, rs35742686) genetic variant was found in one of the samples. This sample also contained the CYP2D6 g.2470T>C (rs17002852) variation, which had an allele frequency of 2.47% in our cohort. Redesign of the CYP2D6*3 pyrosequencing and hydrolysis probe assays to avoid CYP2D6 g.2470 corrected the anomaly. CONCLUSION: To evidence allele drop out and increase the accuracy of genotyping, intra-patient validation of the same genetic variation with at least two separate methods should be considered.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND/AIM: Accurate genotyping of CYP2D6 is challenging due to its inherent genetic variation, copy number variation (duplications and deletions) and hybrid formation with highly homologous pseudogenes. Because a relatively high percentage (∼25%) of clinically prescribed drugs are substrates for this enzyme, accurate determination of its genotype for phenotype prediction is essential. METHODS: A cohort of 365 patient samples was genotyped for CYP2D6 using Sanger sequencing (as the gold standard), hydrolysis probe assays or pyrosequencing. RESULTS: A discrepant result between the three genotyping methods for the loss of function CYP2D6*3 (g.2549delA, rs35742686) genetic variant was found in one of the samples. This sample also contained the CYP2D6 g.2470T>C (rs17002852) variation, which had an allele frequency of 2.47% in our cohort. Redesign of the CYP2D6*3 pyrosequencing and hydrolysis probe assays to avoid CYP2D6 g.2470 corrected the anomaly. CONCLUSION: To evidence allele drop out and increase the accuracy of genotyping, intra-patient validation of the same genetic variation with at least two separate methods should be considered.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Accurate genotyping of CYP2D6 is challenging due to its inherent genetic variation, copy number variation (duplications and deletions) and hybrid formation with highly homologous pseudogenes. Because a relatively high percentage (∼25%) of clinically prescribed drugs are substrates for this enzyme, accurate determination of its genotype for phenotype prediction is essential. METHODS: A cohort of 365 patient samples was genotyped for CYP2D6 using Sanger sequencing (as the gold standard), hydrolysis probe assays or pyrosequencing. RESULTS: A discrepant result between the three genotyping methods for the loss of function CYP2D6*3 (g.2549delA, rs35742686) genetic variant was found in one of the samples. This sample also contained the CYP2D6 g.2470T>C (rs17002852) variation, which had an allele frequency of 2.47% in our cohort. Redesign of the CYP2D6*3 pyrosequencing and hydrolysis probe assays to avoid CYP2D6 g.2470 corrected the anomaly. CONCLUSION: To evidence allele drop out and increase the accuracy of genotyping, intra-patient validation of the same genetic variation with at least two separate methods should be considered.

Key concepts: Genotyping, Pyrosequencing, Genetics, Genotype, Biology, Sanger sequencing, Genetic variation, CYP2D6

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Allele Drop Out Conferred by a Frequent CYP2D6 Genetic Variation For Commonly Used CYP2D6*3 Genotyping Assays — Research Paper | ScholarLens