2014Falmouth University Research Repository (FURR) (Falmouth University)Requires access

Documentary Sound: Beyond the Diegetic

David Prior

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Over the last ten years or so, there has been a growing body of literature emerging that examines the role of sound in film. While case studies have been diverse, attention to sound in documentary film has been notable by its relative absence. The term ‘sound design’, widely attributed to Walter Murch, has become shorthand for the overall composition of a film’s sound track. In this paper I will suggest that far from being a dispassionate description of the way in which sound is integrated with film images, the notion of ‘sound design’ has privileged certain approaches to sound editing and has skewed discourse around film sound towards genres in which sound plays a primarily mimetic, rather than diagetic function. Acknowledging the implied post-production contrivance in the term ‘sound design’, I will focus on the role of sound in documentary film and explore some of the reasons why there are so few examples of documentary films that can be recognised as having made a significant contribution to the state of the art of film sound.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Over the last ten years or so, there has been a growing body of literature emerging that examines the role of sound in film. While case studies have been diverse, attention to sound in documentary film has been notable by its relative absence. The term ‘sound design’, widely attributed to Walter Murch, has become shorthand for the overall composition of a film’s sound track. In this paper I will suggest that far from being a dispassionate description of the way in which sound is integrated with film images, the notion of ‘sound design’ has privileged certain approaches to sound editing and has skewed discourse around film sound towards genres in which sound plays a primarily mimetic, rather than diagetic function. Acknowledging the implied post-production contrivance in the term ‘sound design’, I will focus on the role of sound in documentary film and explore some of the reasons why there are so few examples of documentary films that can be recognised as having made a significant contribution to the state of the art of film sound.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Over the last ten years or so, there has been a growing body of literature emerging that examines the role of sound in film. While case studies have been diverse, attention to sound in documentary film has been notable by its relative absence. The term ‘sound design’, widely attributed to Walter Murch, has become shorthand for the overall composition of a film’s sound track. In this paper I will suggest that far from being a dispassionate description of the way in which sound is integrated with film images, the notion of ‘sound design’ has privileged certain approaches to sound editing and has skewed discourse around film sound towards genres in which sound plays a primarily mimetic, rather than diagetic function. Acknowledging the implied post-production contrivance in the term ‘sound design’, I will focus on the role of sound in documentary film and explore some of the reasons why there are so few examples of documentary films that can be recognised as having made a significant contribution to the state of the art of film sound.

Key concepts: Sound (geography), Sound design, Focus (optics), Documentary film, Acoustics, Aesthetics, Visual arts, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Documentary Sound: Beyond the Diegetic — Research Paper | ScholarLens